rs6966525
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001277115.2(DNAH11):c.188G>C(p.Gly63Ala) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000587 in 1,558,042 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001277115.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- primary ciliary dyskinesia 7Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
- primary ciliary dyskinesiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00307 AC: 468AN: 152248Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000683 AC: 112AN: 163904 AF XY: 0.000527 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000314 AC: 441AN: 1405676Hom.: 1 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.000284 AC XY: 197AN XY: 693908 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00311 AC: 474AN: 152366Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00298 AC XY: 222AN XY: 74514 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
- -
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not specified Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at