rs7180446
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_152594.3(SPRED1):c.424-8C>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.882 in 1,612,586 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 629,837 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_152594.3 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPRED1 | NM_152594.3 | c.424-8C>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000299084.9 | NP_689807.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPRED1 | ENST00000299084.9 | c.424-8C>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_152594.3 | ENSP00000299084.4 | ||||
SPRED1 | ENST00000561317.1 | c.361-8C>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 4 | ENSP00000453680.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.824 AC: 125209AN: 151918Hom.: 52390 Cov.: 30
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.865 AC: 217263AN: 251082Hom.: 94677 AF XY: 0.873 AC XY: 118505AN XY: 135722
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.888 AC: 1296882AN: 1460550Hom.: 577434 Cov.: 42 AF XY: 0.889 AC XY: 645933AN XY: 726618
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.824 AC: 125273AN: 152036Hom.: 52403 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.826 AC XY: 61370AN XY: 74316
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 14, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Sep 10, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 14, 2012 | 424-8C>A in intron 4 of SPRED1: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 90% (6302/7020) of European America n chromosomes and 69% (2574/3738) of African American chromosomes from a broad p opulation by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EV S/; dbSNP rs7180446). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Legius syndrome Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 15, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 17, 2017 | Variant summary: The SPRED1 c.424-8C>A variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved intronic nucleotide. Mutation taster predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 4/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. This variant was found in 104727/121254 control chromosomes (45629 homozygotes) from ExAC at a frequency of 0.8636993 at a frequency of 0.8636993, which is approximately 345479 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic SPRED1 variant (0.0000025), therefore this variant is a benign common polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications and/or reputable databases/clinical diagnostic laboratories; nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at