rs72552027
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_001037.5(SCN1B):c.28G>A(p.Gly10Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000501 in 968,158 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G10D) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001037.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN1B | NM_001037.5 | c.28G>A | p.Gly10Ser | missense_variant | 1/6 | ENST00000262631.11 | |
SCN1B | NM_199037.5 | c.28G>A | p.Gly10Ser | missense_variant | 1/3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN1B | ENST00000262631.11 | c.28G>A | p.Gly10Ser | missense_variant | 1/6 | 1 | NM_001037.5 | P1 | |
SCN1B | ENST00000415950.5 | c.28G>A | p.Gly10Ser | missense_variant | 1/3 | 1 | |||
SCN1B | ENST00000638536.1 | c.28G>A | p.Gly10Ser | missense_variant | 1/5 | 1 | P1 | ||
SCN1B | ENST00000595652.5 | c.28G>A | p.Gly10Ser | missense_variant | 1/6 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00222 AC: 332AN: 149576Hom.: 6 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00169 AC: 1AN: 592Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00267 AC XY: 1AN XY: 374
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000184 AC: 151AN: 818476Hom.: 0 Cov.: 11 AF XY: 0.000138 AC XY: 54AN XY: 392200
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00223 AC: 334AN: 149682Hom.: 6 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00220 AC XY: 161AN XY: 73042
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Jan 31, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 02, 2019 | Reported in one African American infant with sudden infant death sydnrome (SIDS) and in one healthy, ethnically-matched control individual (Tan et al., 2010); Reported in one patient with LQTS (Rurio et al., 2014); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24662403, 20226894) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 17, 2016 | Variant summary: The SCN1B c.28G>A (p.Gly10Ser) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, is not located in a known functional domain, and 2/4 in silico tools predict a benign outcome (SNPs&GO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in 16/5008 control chromosomes, predominantly observed in the African subpopulation (16/1322 African alleles from 1000G; 0.01210). This frequency is significantly greater than the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic SCN1B variant (0.00001), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of African origin. However, the site is covered in fewer than 80% of the individuals in ExAC, which may indicate a low-quality site. The variant was identified in one SIDS case (also found in healthy African American adult control) and one LQTS patient without evidence of causality (i.e. co-segregation). In addition, one clinical diagnostic laboratory classified this variant as a VUS. Taken together and based on the allele frequency in the African subpopulation, this variant is classified as Likely Benign until additional information is available. - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Dec 15, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Apr 13, 2016 | - - |
Brugada syndrome 5 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 28, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
SCN1B-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Nov 22, 2021 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus, type 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 28, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 14, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at