rs72552735
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 16 ACMG points: 16P and 0B. PM1PM2PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_003060.4(SLC22A5):c.1433C>T(p.Pro478Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,810 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003060.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461810Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727214
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Renal carnitine transport defect Pathogenic:3
For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects SLC22A5 function (PMID: 10454528, 10559218, 28841266). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt SLC22A5 protein function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 6419). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with primary carnitine deficiency (PMID: 10072434). In at least one individual the data is consistent with being in trans (on the opposite chromosome) from a pathogenic variant. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 478 of the SLC22A5 protein (p.Pro478Leu). -
- -
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at