Menu
GeneBe

rs72646850

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.63023C>T(p.Thr21008Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0124 in 1,613,206 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 171 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0099 ( 12 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.013 ( 159 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

15

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:27

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.23
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, TTN
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0029550493).
BP6
Variant 2-178588702-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178588702-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 47188.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-178588702-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr2-178588702-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00987 (1501/152132) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0155 (1055/67968). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0147. There are 12 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 695 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 12 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.63023C>T p.Thr21008Ile missense_variant 304/363 ENST00000589042.5
TTN-AS1NR_038272.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.3189-2437G>A intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.63023C>T p.Thr21008Ile missense_variant 304/3635 NM_001267550.2 P1
TTN-AS1ENST00000659121.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.417-8894G>A intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00987
AC:
1501
AN:
152014
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00280
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00329
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0143
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0164
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000195
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00198
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0155
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0129
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00924
AC:
2297
AN:
248498
Hom.:
15
AF XY:
0.00935
AC XY:
1260
AN XY:
134820
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00181
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0110
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0146
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000785
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00228
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0141
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0131
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0126
AC:
18449
AN:
1461074
Hom.:
159
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0124
AC XY:
9025
AN XY:
726820
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00158
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0110
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0143
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00106
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00242
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0148
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0126
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00987
AC:
1501
AN:
152132
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00935
AC XY:
695
AN XY:
74368
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00279
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0143
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0164
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000195
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00198
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0155
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0128
Alfa
AF:
0.0133
Hom.:
23
Bravo
AF:
0.0103
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0146
AC:
54
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0104
AC:
40
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00315
AC:
12
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0163
AC:
134
ExAC
AF:
0.00937
AC:
1132
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000578
AC:
2
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.0156
EpiControl
AF:
0.0160

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:27
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:10
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJun 24, 2013- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineFeb 17, 2012Thr18440Ile in exon 253 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 1.5% (103/6642) of European America n chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (htt p://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs72646850). -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJan 28, 2021- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 19, 2012This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesOct 25, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenApr 01, 2024TTN: BP4, BS1, BS2 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy;C0018802:Congestive heart failure;C0878544:Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San DiegoApr 01, 2019- -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioDec 03, 2015- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 08, 2013This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.092
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.57
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.59
Cadd
Benign
0.41
Dann
Benign
0.71
Eigen
Benign
-1.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.016
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.76
T;T;T;.;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0030
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.27
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.45
N;N;.;.;N;N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.17
Sift
Benign
0.39
T;T;.;.;T;T;.
Polyphen
0.0
.;.;.;B;.;.;B
Vest4
0.11
MVP
0.055
MPC
0.090
ClinPred
0.0026
T
GERP RS
-6.5

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs72646850; hg19: chr2-179453429; API