rs727503359

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBS1_Supporting

The NM_194248.3(OTOF):c.2252C>T(p.Thr751Met) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000645 in 1,612,588 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00019 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000051 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

OTOF
NM_194248.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.92

Variant links:

Genes affected

OTOF (HGNC:8515): (otoferlin) Mutations in this gene are a cause of neurosensory nonsyndromic recessive deafness, DFNB9. The short form of the encoded protein has 3 C2 domains, a single carboxy-terminal transmembrane domain found also in the C. elegans spermatogenesis factor FER-1 and human dysferlin, while the long form has 6 C2 domains. The homology suggests that this protein may be involved in vesicle membrane fusion. Several transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

OTOF links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.19577885).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000191 (29/152162) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.0017 (26/15284). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00119. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 17 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
OTOF	NM_194248.3 link	c.2252C>T	p.Thr751Met	missense_variant	Exon 19 of 47	ENST00000272371.7	NP_919224.1	Q9HC10-1
OTOF	NM_194323.3 link	c.11C>T	p.Thr4Met	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 29	ENST00000339598.8	NP_919304.1	Q9HC10-2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
OTOF	ENST00000272371.7 link	c.2252C>T	p.Thr751Met	missense_variant	Exon 19 of 47	1	NM_194248.3	ENSP00000272371.2		Q9HC10-1
OTOF	ENST00000339598.8 link	c.11C>T	p.Thr4Met	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 29	1	NM_194323.3	ENSP00000344521.3		Q9HC10-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000191

AC:

AN:

152162

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00170

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000116

AC:

AN:

249758

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000737

AC XY:

AN XY:

135614

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000694

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000356

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000164

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000514

AC:

AN:

1460426

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000468

AC XY:

AN XY:

726504

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000559

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000333

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000149

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000191

AC:

AN:

152162

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000229

AC XY:

AN XY:

74338

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00170

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000533

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000155

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1

Oct 17, 2013

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The Thr61Met variant in the OTOF gene has not been previously reported in indivi duals with hearing loss or in large population studies. Computational analyses ( biochemical amino acid properties, conservation, AlignGVGD, PolyPhen2, and SIFT) suggest that the variant may impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. In summary, additional data is neede d to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -

Inborn genetic diseases

Uncertain:1

Jun 11, 2021

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The c.2252C>T (p.T751M) alteration is located in exon 19 (coding exon 19) of the OTOF gene. This alteration results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 2252, causing the threonine (T) at amino acid position 751 to be replaced by a methionine (M). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 9

Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Apr 15, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.11

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.053

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

0.050

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.069

.;.;.;T;.;.

Eigen

Uncertain

0.49

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.48

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.97

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.94

D;D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.056

MetaRNN

Benign

0.20

T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.12

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.9

.;.;.;L;L;.

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.76

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.7

N;N;.;N;N;.

REVEL

Uncertain

0.42

Sift

Benign

0.037

D;T;.;T;T;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.15

T;T;.;T;T;.

Polyphen

0.97

D;D;.;D;.;D

Vest4

0.56

MutPred

0.21

.;.;.;Loss of methylation at K750 (P = 0.0286);Loss of methylation at K750 (P = 0.0286);.;

MVP

0.94

MPC

0.19

ClinPred

0.14

GERP RS

4.8

Varity_R

0.11

gMVP

0.49

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over