rs7336216
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_018451.5(CENPJ):āc.187G>Cā(p.Asp63His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00391 in 1,614,124 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 226 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018451.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CENPJ | ENST00000381884.9 | c.187G>C | p.Asp63His | missense_variant | 2/17 | 1 | NM_018451.5 | ENSP00000371308.4 | ||
CENPJ | ENST00000616936.4 | n.187G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/16 | 1 | ENSP00000477511.1 | ||||
CENPJ | ENST00000545981.6 | n.187G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/18 | 2 | ENSP00000441090.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0198 AC: 3010AN: 152128Hom.: 108 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00550 AC: 1384AN: 251418Hom.: 47 AF XY: 0.00420 AC XY: 571AN XY: 135882
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00225 AC: 3291AN: 1461878Hom.: 115 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00189 AC XY: 1378AN XY: 727238
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0198 AC: 3022AN: 152246Hom.: 111 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0195 AC XY: 1450AN XY: 74444
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Sep 07, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Microcephaly 6, primary, autosomal recessive Benign:1Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | GeneReviews | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Microcephaly 6, primary, autosomal recessive;C3888212:Seckel syndrome 4 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Sep 16, 2021 | - - |
Seckel syndrome 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at