rs73920285
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The ENST00000272371.7(OTOF):c.2829C>T(p.Gly943=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00709 in 1,611,102 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 629 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.037 ( 326 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0040 ( 303 hom. )
Consequence
OTOF
ENST00000272371.7 synonymous
ENST00000272371.7 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.306
Genes affected
OTOF (HGNC:8515): (otoferlin) Mutations in this gene are a cause of neurosensory nonsyndromic recessive deafness, DFNB9. The short form of the encoded protein has 3 C2 domains, a single carboxy-terminal transmembrane domain found also in the C. elegans spermatogenesis factor FER-1 and human dysferlin, while the long form has 6 C2 domains. The homology suggests that this protein may be involved in vesicle membrane fusion. Several transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.46).
BP6
Variant 2-26476165-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-26476165-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 48206.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-26476165-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.306 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.123 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTOF | NM_194248.3 | c.2829C>T | p.Gly943= | synonymous_variant | 23/47 | ENST00000272371.7 | NP_919224.1 | |
OTOF | NM_194323.3 | c.588C>T | p.Gly196= | synonymous_variant | 6/29 | ENST00000339598.8 | NP_919304.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTOF | ENST00000272371.7 | c.2829C>T | p.Gly943= | synonymous_variant | 23/47 | 1 | NM_194248.3 | ENSP00000272371 | A1 | |
OTOF | ENST00000339598.8 | c.588C>T | p.Gly196= | synonymous_variant | 6/29 | 1 | NM_194323.3 | ENSP00000344521 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0366 AC: 5565AN: 152044Hom.: 327 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
5565
AN:
152044
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00967 AC: 2387AN: 246862Hom.: 135 AF XY: 0.00709 AC XY: 952AN XY: 134290
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
2387
AN:
246862
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
952
AN XY:
134290
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00401 AC: 5850AN: 1458940Hom.: 303 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00343 AC XY: 2493AN XY: 725780
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
5850
AN:
1458940
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
2493
AN XY:
725780
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0366 AC: 5574AN: 152162Hom.: 326 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0356 AC XY: 2646AN XY: 74412
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
5574
AN:
152162
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2646
AN XY:
74412
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
28
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 25, 2011 | Gly943Gly in exon 23 of OTOF: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located near a splice junction, is listed in dbSNP (rs73920285- no frequency data) and has been observed in 5/240 (2%) cases. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 15, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 9 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at