rs749491943
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 5 ACMG points: 5P and 0B. PM2PP3_ModeratePP5
The NM_138691.3(TMC1):c.1141T>A(p.Tyr381Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000397 in 1,613,936 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_138691.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMC1 | NM_138691.3 | c.1141T>A | p.Tyr381Asn | missense_variant | 15/24 | ENST00000297784.10 | NP_619636.2 | |
TMC1 | XM_017014256.2 | c.1144T>A | p.Tyr382Asn | missense_variant | 12/21 | XP_016869745.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMC1 | ENST00000297784.10 | c.1141T>A | p.Tyr381Asn | missense_variant | 15/24 | 1 | NM_138691.3 | ENSP00000297784 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000279 AC: 7AN: 251336Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000368 AC XY: 5AN XY: 135806
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000410 AC: 60AN: 1461762Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000275 AC XY: 20AN XY: 727182
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74344
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 31, 2016 | - - |
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 18, 2020 | Observed in other unrelated patients with hearing loss in published literature; variant was heterozygous with no other variant in one patient and was heterozygous with a second variant in the other patient, however, it is unknown if these variants were on the same allele (in cis) or on different alleles (in trans) (Sommen et al., 2016; Likar et al., 2018); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29889784, 27068579, 29293505, 24875298) - |
Rare genetic deafness Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Nov 02, 2017 | The p.Tyr381Asn variant in TMC1 has been reported in 2 individuals with hearing loss in compound heterozygosity with another pathogenic TMC1 variant and segrega ted in an affected family member (Sommen 2016, LMM data). This variant has been identified in 7/126578 European chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs749491943); however, its freq uency is low enough to be consistent with a recessive carrier frequency for hear ing loss. Computational prediction tools and conservation analysis suggest that the p.Tyr381Asn variant may impact the protein, though this information is not p redictive enough to determine pathogenicity. In summary, although additional stu dies are required to fully establish its clinical significance, this variant is likely pathogenic for autosomal recessive nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing los s. ACMG/AMP criteria applied: PM3, PM2, PP1, PP3. - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 7 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Centre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana | Jan 01, 2016 | This variant was classified as: Uncertain significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at