rs757213444

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BA1

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The filtering allele frequency of the c.1772A>G (p.Asn591Ser) variant in the SOS1 gene is 0.054% (11/11524) of Latino chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel (BA1; PMID:29493581) LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA1624554/MONDO:0021060/004

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000021 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SOS1
NM_005633.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.37

Publications

3 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

SOS1 (HGNC:11187): (SOS Ras/Rac guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1) This gene encodes a protein that is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for RAS proteins, membrane proteins that bind guanine nucleotides and participate in signal transduction pathways. GTP binding activates and GTP hydrolysis inactivates RAS proteins. The product of this gene may regulate RAS proteins by facilitating the exchange of GTP for GDP. Mutations in this gene are associated with gingival fibromatosis 1 and Noonan syndrome type 4. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

SOS1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Noonan syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
Noonan syndrome 4
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
fibromatosis, gingival, 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
hereditary gingival fibromatosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Costello syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

SOS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.

BA1

For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_005633.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
SOS1	NM_005633.4	MANE Select	c.1772A>G	p.Asn591Ser	missense	Exon 10 of 23	NP_005624.2
SOS1	NM_001382394.1		c.1751A>G	p.Asn584Ser	missense	Exon 10 of 23	NP_001369323.1
SOS1	NM_001382395.1		c.1772A>G	p.Asn591Ser	missense	Exon 10 of 22	NP_001369324.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
SOS1	ENST00000402219.8	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.1772A>G	p.Asn591Ser	missense	Exon 10 of 23	ENSP00000384675.2
SOS1	ENST00000395038.6	TSL:5	c.1772A>G	p.Asn591Ser	missense	Exon 10 of 22	ENSP00000378479.2
SOS1	ENST00000692089.1		c.1661A>G	p.Asn554Ser	missense	Exon 9 of 22	ENSP00000508626.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152036

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000197

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000120

AC:

AN:

250596

AF XY:

0.0000960

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000868

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000212

AC:

AN:

1461224

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000179

AC XY:

AN XY:

726934

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33458

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000693

AC:

AN:

44712

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26108

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39678

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86244

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53404

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

1111486

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

60368

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.488

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000197

AC:

AN:

152036

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74286

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41430

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000197

AC:

AN:

15260

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3466

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5200

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4836

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10626

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

67898

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.492

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.0000782

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000567

ExAC

AF:

0.0000906

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Jul 05, 2017

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Jan 19, 2018

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Asn591Ser in exon 10 of SOS1: This variant has been classified as benign by a ClinGen-approved expert panel (ClinVar ID:448943). It is not expected to have cl inical significance because it has been identified in 0.09% (32/34374) of Latino chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinst itute.org/; dbSNP rs757213444). ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BA1; BP4.

RASopathy

Benign:2

Apr 18, 2017

ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel

Significance:Benign

Review Status:reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method:curation

The filtering allele frequency of the c.1772A>G (p.Asn591Ser) variant in the SOS1 gene is 0.054% (11/11524) of Latino chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel (BA1; PMID:29493581)

Oct 15, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

SOS1-related disorder

Benign:1

May 16, 2023

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Sep 26, 2023

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.086

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.53

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.60

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.98

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.43

Eigen

Benign

-0.062

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.13

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.92

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.90

M_CAP

Benign

0.0054

MetaRNN

Benign

0.070

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.4

PhyloP100

3.4

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.59

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.97

REVEL

Benign

0.10

Sift

Benign

0.15

Sift4G

Benign

0.30

Polyphen

0.025

Vest4

0.24

MutPred

0.29

Gain of catalytic residue at N591 (P = 0.0752)

MVP

0.44

MPC

0.45

ClinPred

0.059

GERP RS

5.7

Varity_R

0.27

gMVP

0.46

Mutation Taster

=56/44

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over