rs757700700
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 11 ACMG points: 11P and 0B. PP4PM3_StrongPS3PM2
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: This variant, c.670C>T (p.Arg224Trp) has been reported in at least 6 individuals with Pompe disease and deficient GAA activity meeting the ClinGen LSD VCEP's PP4 specifications. All of these individuals are compound heterozygous for the variant and a unique pathogenic variant, including c.-32-13T>G (PMID 25673129; phase unknown), c.525delT (PMID 12923862; phase unknown), c.763C > T (p.Gln255Ter) (PMID 25026126, confirmed in trans), c.2237G>A (p.Trp746Ter) (PMID 12923862; phase unknown), c.1064T>C (p.Leu355Pro)(PMID 23632174; confirmed in trans), and c.1979G>A (p.Arg660His) (PMID 14643388; phase unknown). These data meet PM3_Strong. Note that the in trans data from the patients with c.1064T>C (p.Leu355Pro) and c.1979G>A (p.Arg660His) will be used in the assessment of those variants and was not used here in order to avoid a circular argument. The highest population minor allele frequency in gnomAD v2.1.1 is 0.00005 in the European non-Finnish population, meeting PM2. The score for the in silico meta-predictor REVEL, does not meet PP3 or BP4. However, when expressed in COS cells, this variant results in significantly reduced GAA activity, <10% of wild type (PMID 12923862, 14643388, 19862843), meeting PS3. There is a ClinVar entry for this variant (Variation ID: 189188, 1 star review status), with two submitters classifying the variant as pathogenic, one as likely pathogenic, and one as a variant of uncertain significance. In summary, the variant meets the criteria to be classified as pathogenic for Pompe disease. GAA-specific ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen LSD VCEP: PS3, PM2, PM3_Strong, PP4. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA274477/MONDO:0009290/010
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000152.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- glycogen storage disease IIInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
- glycogen storage disease due to acid maltase deficiency, infantile onsetInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- glycogen storage disease due to acid maltase deficiency, late-onsetInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 11 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000152.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAA | MANE Select | c.670C>T | p.Arg224Trp | missense | Exon 3 of 20 | NP_000143.2 | P10253 | ||
| GAA | c.670C>T | p.Arg224Trp | missense | Exon 4 of 21 | NP_001073271.1 | P10253 | |||
| GAA | c.670C>T | p.Arg224Trp | missense | Exon 3 of 20 | NP_001073272.1 | P10253 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAA | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.670C>T | p.Arg224Trp | missense | Exon 3 of 20 | ENSP00000305692.3 | P10253 | ||
| GAA | TSL:1 | c.670C>T | p.Arg224Trp | missense | Exon 4 of 21 | ENSP00000374665.3 | P10253 | ||
| GAA | c.-132C>T | 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain | Exon 2 of 19 | ENSP00000519344.1 | A0AAQ5BHE1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152210Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000205 AC: 5AN: 243354 AF XY: 0.0000151 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000249 AC: 36AN: 1447026Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000236 AC XY: 17AN XY: 719062 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152328Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74478 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at