rs763765599
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 1P and 4B. PP2BP4_Strong
The NM_000540.3(RYR1):āc.949A>Gā(p.Ile317Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000438 in 1,461,804 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000540.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR1 | NM_000540.3 | c.949A>G | p.Ile317Val | missense_variant | 10/106 | ENST00000359596.8 | NP_000531.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR1 | ENST00000359596.8 | c.949A>G | p.Ile317Val | missense_variant | 10/106 | 5 | NM_000540.3 | ENSP00000352608.2 | ||
RYR1 | ENST00000355481.8 | c.949A>G | p.Ile317Val | missense_variant | 10/105 | 1 | ENSP00000347667.3 | |||
RYR1 | ENST00000599547.6 | n.949A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 10/80 | 2 | ENSP00000471601.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251208Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135868
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000438 AC: 64AN: 1461804Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000413 AC XY: 30AN XY: 727210
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Aug 13, 2024 | This missense variant replaces isoleucine with valine at codon 317 of the RYR1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with RYR1-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 1/251208 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
RYR1-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Aug 28, 2021 | This sequence change replaces isoleucine with valine at codon 317 of the RYR1 protein (p.Ile317Val). The isoleucine residue is moderately conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between isoleucine and valine. This variant is present in population databases (rs763765599, ExAC 0.002%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with RYR1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 590631). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The valine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 02, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at