rs767328866
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_020433.5(JPH2):c.637C>T(p.Arg213Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000241 in 1,432,604 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_020433.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPH2 | NM_020433.5 | c.637C>T | p.Arg213Trp | missense_variant | 2/6 | ENST00000372980.4 | NP_065166.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPH2 | ENST00000372980.4 | c.637C>T | p.Arg213Trp | missense_variant | 2/6 | 5 | NM_020433.5 | ENSP00000362071 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00127 AC: 192AN: 151650Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000374 AC: 19AN: 50800Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000301 AC XY: 9AN XY: 29854
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000119 AC: 153AN: 1280846Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000105 AC XY: 66AN XY: 629038
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00127 AC: 192AN: 151758Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00116 AC XY: 86AN XY: 74174
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 14, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 10, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jun 12, 2015 | The p.Arg213Trp variant in JPH2 has not been previously reported in individuals with cardiomyopathy, but has been identified in 0.1% (4/3380) of South Asian chr omosomes and 1/82 African chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org). Computational prediction tools and conservatio n analysis do not provide strong support for or against an impact to the protein . In summary, the clinical significance of the p.Arg213Trp variant is uncertain. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 17;C5561970:Cardiomyopathy, dilated, 2E Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago | Mar 30, 2021 | JPH2 NM_020433.4 exon 2 p.Arg213Trp (c.637C>T): This variant has not been reported in the literature but is present in 0.07% (64/81352) of total alleles in the Genome Aggregation Database, including 2 homozygotes (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/20-42788790-G-A). This variant is present in ClinVar (Variation ID:201797). Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools for this variant are unclear. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. - |
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 18, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 21, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at