rs768155147
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 2P and 8B. PM2BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_138964.4(PROKR1):c.632G>A(p.Ser211Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000342 in 1,461,706 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S211T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_138964.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_138964.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROKR1 | NM_138964.4 | MANE Select | c.632G>A | p.Ser211Asn | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | NP_620414.1 | Q8TCW9 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROKR1 | ENST00000303786.5 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.632G>A | p.Ser211Asn | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000303775.4 | Q8TCW9 | |
| APLF | ENST00000627740.1 | TSL:5 | n.1344G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 6 of 6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000342 AC: 5AN: 1461706Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727170 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at