rs770530257
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 1P and 9B. PM4_SupportingBP6BS1BS2
The NM_001148.6(ANK2):c.2472_2474delCAC(p.Thr825del) variant causes a disruptive inframe deletion, splice region change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000239 in 1,612,650 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. 1/1 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001148.6 disruptive_inframe_deletion, splice_region
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- complex neurodevelopmental disorderInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
- Brugada syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen
- catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardiaInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp
- heart conduction diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- neurodevelopmental disorderInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: G2P
- cardiac arrhythmia, ankyrin-B-relatedInheritance: Unknown, AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- long QT syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000145 AC: 22AN: 151936Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000240 AC: 60AN: 249986 AF XY: 0.000281 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000249 AC: 363AN: 1460714Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000246 AC XY: 179AN XY: 726720 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000145 AC: 22AN: 151936Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000943 AC XY: 7AN XY: 74198 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
Identified in a patient with Brugada syndrome in the published literature (Di Resta et al., 2015); variant described as c.87_89del due to alternate nomenclature; In-frame deletion of 1 amino acid in a repetitive region with no known function; In silico analysis supports a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26220970) -
- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Note this variant was found in clinical genetic testing performed by one or more labs who may also submit to ClinVar. Thus any internal case data may overlap with the internal case data of other labs. The interpretation reviewed below is that of the Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease. Based on the data reviewed below, we consider this a variant of uncertain significance. It has not been reported in the literature as a disease-causing mutation nor as a benign polymorphism. In total the variant has also been seen in 35/~6260 individuals from publicly available population datasets. The deleted Threonine is part of a string of 6 Threonines in a row: amino acids 821-826. Therefore, a deletion of any one of them produces the same result. It is listed in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project dataset as p.V820_T821delinsV, and was seen in 26/4130 Caucasian and 9/2130 African American individuals. The variant does not appear to be present in 1000 genomes (as of August 29, 2014). -
Long QT syndrome Benign:1
- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at