rs770824805
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_032578.4(MYPN):c.748A>C(p.Thr250Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000412 in 1,457,596 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_032578.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYPN | NM_032578.4 | c.748A>C | p.Thr250Pro | missense_variant | Exon 2 of 20 | ENST00000358913.10 | NP_115967.2 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000161 AC: 4AN: 247880Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 133966
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000412 AC: 6AN: 1457596Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000414 AC XY: 3AN XY: 724750
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
p.Thr250Pro (c.748A>C) in exon 2 of the MYPN gene (NM_032578.3) We have seen this variant in a person with HCM who also had another very likely pathogenic variant. This variant is located in a gene with limited evidence to link it to HCM and there is no case data for this variant. Therefore, we consider this variant to be of uncertain significance and we do not feel it is suitable for assessing risk in healthy relatives ("predictive genetic testing"). The variant has not been reported in the literature. Per the Invitae report, "This sequence change replaces threonine with proline at codon 250 of the MYPN protein (p.Thr250Pro). The threonine residue is weakly conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between threonine and Proline...Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated, but these predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies." The variant was reported online in 4 of 124,213 individuals in the Genome Aggregation Consortium Dataset (gnomAD; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/), which currently includes variant calls on 126,216 unrelated individuals of African, Asian, European, Ashkenazi, Latino descent. Specifically, the variant was observed in 4 of 8,649 individuals of East Asian descent (0.02% MAF). The phenotype of those individuals is not publicly available. The dataset is comprised of multiple cohorts, some of which were recruited from the general population, others were enriched for common cardiovascular disease. -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1KK Uncertain:1
In summary, this variant is a rare missense change that is not predicted to affect protein function. There is no indication that it causes disease, but the available evidence is currently insufficient to prove that conclusively. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated, but these predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies. This variant is present in population databases (rs770824805, ExAC 0.02%) but has not been reported in the literature in individuals with a MYPN-related disease. This sequence change replaces threonine with proline at codon 250 of the MYPN protein (p.Thr250Pro). The threonine residue is weakly conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between threonine and proline. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at