Menu
GeneBe

rs77523018

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000245.4(MET):c.1085T>C(p.Met362Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00128 in 1,595,714 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 27 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M362V) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0069 ( 15 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00069 ( 12 hom. )

Consequence

MET
NM_000245.4 missense

Scores

1
4
13

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.67
Variant links:
Genes affected
MET (HGNC:7029): (MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase) This gene encodes a member of the receptor tyrosine kinase family of proteins and the product of the proto-oncogene MET. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate alpha and beta subunits that are linked via disulfide bonds to form the mature receptor. Further processing of the beta subunit results in the formation of the M10 peptide, which has been shown to reduce lung fibrosis. Binding of its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor, induces dimerization and activation of the receptor, which plays a role in cellular survival, embryogenesis, and cellular migration and invasion. Mutations in this gene are associated with papillary renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and various head and neck cancers. Amplification and overexpression of this gene are also associated with multiple human cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.015252113).
BP6
Variant 7-116700169-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-116700169-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 93565.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr7-116700169-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0069 (1051/152318) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0237 (986/41572). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0225. There are 15 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 488 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 15 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
METNM_000245.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1085T>C p.Met362Thr missense_variant 2/21 ENST00000397752.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
METENST00000397752.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1085T>C p.Met362Thr missense_variant 2/211 NM_000245.4 P3P08581-1
METENST00000318493.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.1085T>C p.Met362Thr missense_variant 2/211 A2P08581-2
METENST00000436117.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1085T>C p.Met362Thr missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 2/201 P08581-3
METENST00000422097.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1085T>C p.Met362Thr missense_variant 2/123

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00691
AC:
1051
AN:
152200
Hom.:
15
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0238
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00321
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00525
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00165
AC:
384
AN:
232778
Hom.:
5
AF XY:
0.00116
AC XY:
146
AN XY:
125664
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0214
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00139
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000834
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000903
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000687
AC:
992
AN:
1443396
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000585
AC XY:
419
AN XY:
716334
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0239
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00136
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000608
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000507
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00149
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00690
AC:
1051
AN:
152318
Hom.:
15
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00655
AC XY:
488
AN XY:
74484
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0237
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00320
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00520
Alfa
AF:
0.00135
Hom.:
4
Bravo
AF:
0.00750
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0211
AC:
82
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000241
AC:
2
ExAC
AF:
0.00191
AC:
231
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 19, 2018This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Feb 18, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Papillary renal cell carcinoma type 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Renal cell carcinoma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJun 19, 2020- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 09, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.35
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.53
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.51
Cadd
Benign
23
Dann
Benign
0.97
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.37
T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
0.050
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.23
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.76
T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.015
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.0
L;L;L
MutationTaster
Benign
0.98
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.36
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.7
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.18
Sift
Uncertain
0.0020
D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0060
D;D;D
Polyphen
0.0040
B;B;.
Vest4
0.37
MVP
0.18
MPC
0.29
ClinPred
0.036
T
GERP RS
6.0
Varity_R
0.44
gMVP
0.73

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs77523018; hg19: chr7-116340223; COSMIC: COSV59270394; COSMIC: COSV59270394; API