Menu
GeneBe

rs77615401

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000363.5(TNNI3):c.244C>T(p.Pro82Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00116 in 1,612,562 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 29 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P82R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0064 ( 17 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00062 ( 12 hom. )

Consequence

TNNI3
NM_000363.5 missense

Scores

4
6
8

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:27O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.66
Variant links:
Genes affected
TNNI3 (HGNC:11947): (troponin I3, cardiac type) Troponin I (TnI), along with troponin T (TnT) and troponin C (TnC), is one of 3 subunits that form the troponin complex of the thin filaments of striated muscle. TnI is the inhibitory subunit; blocking actin-myosin interactions and thereby mediating striated muscle relaxation. The TnI subfamily contains three genes: TnI-skeletal-fast-twitch, TnI-skeletal-slow-twitch, and TnI-cardiac. This gene encodes the TnI-cardiac protein and is exclusively expressed in cardiac muscle tissues. Mutations in this gene cause familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy type 7 (CMH7) and familial restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM). Troponin I is useful in making a diagnosis of heart failure, and of ischemic heart disease. An elevated level of troponin is also now used as indicator of acute myocardial injury in patients hospitalized with moderate/severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Such elevation has also been associated with higher risk of mortality in cardiovascular disease patients hospitalized due to COVID-19. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

PM1
In a chain Troponin I, cardiac muscle (size 208) in uniprot entity TNNI3_HUMAN there are 152 pathogenic changes around while only 19 benign (89%) in NM_000363.5
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009637028).
BP6
Variant 19-55156239-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-55156239-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 12421.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-55156239-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr19-55156239-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr19-55156239-G-A is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00638 (972/152278) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0224 (932/41542). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0212. There are 17 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 476 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 17 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
TNNI3NM_000363.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.244C>T p.Pro82Ser missense_variant 5/8 ENST00000344887.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
TNNI3ENST00000344887.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.244C>T p.Pro82Ser missense_variant 5/81 NM_000363.5 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00637
AC:
970
AN:
152162
Hom.:
17
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0225
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00430
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00145
AC:
350
AN:
241630
Hom.:
4
AF XY:
0.00123
AC XY:
164
AN XY:
132910
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0230
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000438
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000329
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000102
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000169
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000616
AC:
899
AN:
1460284
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000563
AC XY:
409
AN XY:
726512
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0226
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000582
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000333
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00124
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00638
AC:
972
AN:
152278
Hom.:
17
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00639
AC XY:
476
AN XY:
74458
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0224
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00426
Alfa
AF:
0.00359
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00694
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0203
AC:
70
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000132
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.00164
AC:
195
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:27Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 09, 2016Variant Summary: The c.244C>T variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide and 4/5 in silico tools predict a deleterious outcome. The variant was observed in the large and broad cohorts of the ExAC project at an allele frequency of 0.17%, predominantly observed in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 2.3% including 3 homozygous occurrences. This frequency exceeds the maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in TNNI3 (0.0125%), suggesting this is a benign polymorphism found primarily in population(s) of African origin. The variant has been reported in the literature in HCM patients and controls, mostly of African descent. However, mouse model studies have suggested the variant to be a disease-modifying factor for dysfunction and adverse remodeling with aging and chronic pressure overload (Ramirez-Correa_2015), although the relationship of this finding to a monogenic causation is unclear, therefore the evidence is not weighed in its classification. Multiple reputable clinical labs have classified the variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJan 31, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 13, 2018This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23299917, 22995991, 25324519, 20981092, 18175163, 23967088, 11815426, 27150586, 21310275, 27532831, 26332594, 31006259) -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsJan 11, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute-- -
not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)May 26, 2014- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineFeb 09, 2012Pro82Ser in exon 5 of TNNI3: This variant is classified as benign based on its h igh frequency in the general population (dbSNP rs77615401; NHLBI Exome Sequencin g Project, http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS). A=57/G=2853 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaOct 30, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 19, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioMar 07, 2019- -
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 7 Benign:1Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 05, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
risk factor, no assertion criteria providedliterature onlyOMIMJul 01, 2008- -
Cardiomyopathy, familial restrictive, 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 05, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy with Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Cardiomyopathy;C2751492:Familial amyloid neuropathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San DiegoJun 03, 2019- -
Dilated Cardiomyopathy, Recessive Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 7;C1861861:Cardiomyopathy, familial restrictive, 1;C2678474:Dilated cardiomyopathy 2A;C2750091:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1FF Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsApr 18, 2022- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 2A Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 05, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Familial restrictive cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 25, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.13
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.15
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.030
Cadd
Pathogenic
27
Dann
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.94
D;D
Eigen
Uncertain
0.50
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.48
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.87
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.82
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0096
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.62
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.7
L;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
A;A
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.76
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-4.4
D;.
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.76
Sift
Benign
0.077
T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.10
T;T
Polyphen
1.0
D;.
Vest4
0.28
MVP
0.96
MPC
1.0
ClinPred
0.045
T
GERP RS
4.4
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.8
Varity_R
0.63

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs77615401; hg19: chr19-55667607; COSMIC: COSV61276775; COSMIC: COSV61276775; API