rs77615401
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000363.5(TNNI3):c.244C>T(p.Pro82Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00116 in 1,612,562 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 29 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P82T) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000363.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNNI3 | NM_000363.5 | c.244C>T | p.Pro82Ser | missense_variant | 5/8 | ENST00000344887.10 | NP_000354.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNNI3 | ENST00000344887.10 | c.244C>T | p.Pro82Ser | missense_variant | 5/8 | 1 | NM_000363.5 | ENSP00000341838 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00637 AC: 970AN: 152162Hom.: 17 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00145 AC: 350AN: 241630Hom.: 4 AF XY: 0.00123 AC XY: 164AN XY: 132910
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000616 AC: 899AN: 1460284Hom.: 12 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000563 AC XY: 409AN XY: 726512
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00638 AC: 972AN: 152278Hom.: 17 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00639 AC XY: 476AN XY: 74458
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:8
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 13, 2018 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23299917, 22995991, 25324519, 20981092, 18175163, 23967088, 11815426, 27150586, 21310275, 27532831, 26332594, 31006259) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 09, 2016 | Variant Summary: The c.244C>T variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide and 4/5 in silico tools predict a deleterious outcome. The variant was observed in the large and broad cohorts of the ExAC project at an allele frequency of 0.17%, predominantly observed in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 2.3% including 3 homozygous occurrences. This frequency exceeds the maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in TNNI3 (0.0125%), suggesting this is a benign polymorphism found primarily in population(s) of African origin. The variant has been reported in the literature in HCM patients and controls, mostly of African descent. However, mouse model studies have suggested the variant to be a disease-modifying factor for dysfunction and adverse remodeling with aging and chronic pressure overload (Ramirez-Correa_2015), although the relationship of this finding to a monogenic causation is unclear, therefore the evidence is not weighed in its classification. Multiple reputable clinical labs have classified the variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Jan 11, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Jan 31, 2020 | - - |
not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Feb 09, 2012 | Pro82Ser in exon 5 of TNNI3: This variant is classified as benign based on its h igh frequency in the general population (dbSNP rs77615401; NHLBI Exome Sequencin g Project, http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS). A=57/G=2853 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 26, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 19, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Oct 30, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Mar 07, 2019 | - - |
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 7 Benign:1Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 05, 2018 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
risk factor, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Jul 01, 2008 | - - |
Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy with Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Dilated Cardiomyopathy, Recessive Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Cardiomyopathy;C2751492:Amyloidosis, hereditary systemic 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego | Jun 03, 2019 | - - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 2A Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 05, 2018 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Cardiomyopathy, familial restrictive, 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 05, 2018 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 7;C1861861:Cardiomyopathy, familial restrictive, 1;C2678474:Dilated cardiomyopathy 2A;C2750091:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1FF Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Apr 18, 2022 | - - |
Familial restrictive cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 25, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at