rs77625410

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):​c.5156A>G​(p.Tyr1719Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0153 in 1,552,260 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 770 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.045 ( 369 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.012 ( 401 hom. )

Consequence

MYO7A
NM_000260.4 missense

Scores

5
5
8

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.81
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO7A (HGNC:7606): (myosin VIIA) This gene is a member of the myosin gene family. Myosins are mechanochemical proteins characterized by the presence of a motor domain, an actin-binding domain, a neck domain that interacts with other proteins, and a tail domain that serves as an anchor. This gene encodes an unconventional myosin with a very short tail. Defects in this gene are associated with the mouse shaker-1 phenotype and the human Usher syndrome 1B which are characterized by deafness, reduced vestibular function, and (in human) retinal degeneration. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.002670139).
BP6
Variant 11-77202412-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-77202412-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 43274.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-77202412-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr11-77202412-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.13 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYO7ANM_000260.4 linkc.5156A>G p.Tyr1719Cys missense_variant Exon 37 of 49 ENST00000409709.9 NP_000251.3 Q13402-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYO7AENST00000409709.9 linkc.5156A>G p.Tyr1719Cys missense_variant Exon 37 of 49 1 NM_000260.4 ENSP00000386331.3 Q13402-1
MYO7AENST00000458637.6 linkc.5042A>G p.Tyr1681Cys missense_variant Exon 37 of 49 1 ENSP00000392185.2 Q13402-2
MYO7AENST00000409619.6 linkc.5009A>G p.Tyr1670Cys missense_variant Exon 38 of 50 1 ENSP00000386635.2 Q13402-8
MYO7AENST00000458169.2 linkc.2582A>G p.Tyr861Cys missense_variant Exon 17 of 29 1 ENSP00000417017.2 H7C4D8
MYO7AENST00000670577.1 linkn.2996A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 20 of 32 ENSP00000499323.1 A0A590UJ94

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0449
AC:
6829
AN:
152074
Hom.:
360
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.133
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0143
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0260
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0118
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00851
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00650
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0285
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0403
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0161
AC:
2528
AN:
157078
Hom.:
82
AF XY:
0.0139
AC XY:
1160
AN XY:
83184
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.128
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0170
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0134
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00662
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00523
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0103
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0177
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0121
AC:
16918
AN:
1400068
Hom.:
401
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0117
AC XY:
8103
AN XY:
690672
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.134
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0184
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0123
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000279
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00716
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00535
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00894
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0189
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0451
AC:
6871
AN:
152192
Hom.:
369
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0431
AC XY:
3206
AN XY:
74408
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.133
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0260
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0118
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000194
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00852
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00650
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0101
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0399
Alfa
AF:
0.0153
Hom.:
114
Bravo
AF:
0.0499
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00917
AC:
34
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0101
AC:
39
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.111
AC:
448
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00896
AC:
74
ExAC
AF:
0.0109
AC:
1117
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0130
AC:
47
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 06, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Dec 28, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3
Feb 06, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 23, 2009
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 05, 2013
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:2
May 31, 2018
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

This variant is interpreted as a Benign, for Usher syndrome 1B, in Autosomal Recessive manner. The following ACMG Tag(s) were applied: BS1 => Allele frequency is greater than expected for disorder. BS2 => Observed in a healthy adult individual for a recessive (homozygous), dominant (heterozygous), or X-linked (hemizygous) disorder, with full penetrance expected at an early age. 6 homozygotes in ExAC. -

Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Usher syndrome type 1B Benign:1
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Usher syndrome type 1;C1832475:Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11;C1838701:Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Benign:1
Apr 28, 2022
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Retinal dystrophy Benign:1
Jan 01, 2009
Institute of Human Genetics, Univ. Regensburg, Univ. Regensburg
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.32
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.37
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.19
CADD
Uncertain
25
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.81
D;.;.;T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.63
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.60
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
1.0
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.99
D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0027
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.93
T
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.0
M;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.86
D
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-4.1
D;D;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.49
Sift
Benign
0.056
T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.16
T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.90
P;.;.;.
Vest4
0.83
MPC
0.48
ClinPred
0.016
T
GERP RS
4.8
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.0
Varity_R
0.46
gMVP
0.60

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs77625410; hg19: chr11-76913457; API