rs77732888

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001194998.2(CEP152):​c.691+9C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0854 in 1,611,154 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6,593 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.071 ( 472 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.087 ( 6121 hom. )

Consequence

CEP152
NM_001194998.2 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.00900
Variant links:
Genes affected
CEP152 (HGNC:29298): (centrosomal protein 152) This gene encodes a protein that is thought to be involved with centrosome function. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary microcephaly (MCPH4). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.67).
BP6
Variant 15-48796001-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-48796001-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 136720.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-48796001-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0974 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CEP152NM_001194998.2 linkc.691+9C>T intron_variant Intron 6 of 26 ENST00000380950.7 NP_001181927.1 O94986-4Q3B7A2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CEP152ENST00000380950.7 linkc.691+9C>T intron_variant Intron 6 of 26 1 NM_001194998.2 ENSP00000370337.2 O94986-4
CEP152ENST00000399334.7 linkc.691+9C>T intron_variant Intron 6 of 25 1 ENSP00000382271.3 O94986-3
CEP152ENST00000325747.9 linkc.412+9C>T intron_variant Intron 5 of 24 1 ENSP00000321000.5 O94986-1
CEP152ENST00000560322.5 linkn.691+9C>T intron_variant Intron 6 of 12 1 ENSP00000453440.1 A0A075B719

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0707
AC:
10751
AN:
152034
Hom.:
472
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0342
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.130
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0847
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.103
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000770
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0528
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0294
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.158
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0994
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0903
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0713
AC:
17755
AN:
249162
Hom.:
809
AF XY:
0.0739
AC XY:
9998
AN XY:
135206
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0337
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0585
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0970
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000557
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0584
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0362
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0983
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0913
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0870
AC:
126885
AN:
1459002
Hom.:
6121
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0867
AC XY:
62976
AN XY:
725954
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0317
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0628
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.102
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000202
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0619
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0394
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0962
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0876
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0707
AC:
10753
AN:
152152
Hom.:
472
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0676
AC XY:
5026
AN XY:
74382
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0342
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0846
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.103
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000772
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0528
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0294
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0994
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0888
Alfa
AF:
0.0919
Hom.:
263
Bravo
AF:
0.0711
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0240
AC:
83
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.107
EpiControl
AF:
0.105

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Dec 20, 2013
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 08, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 16, 2013
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Microcephaly 9, primary, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Seckel syndrome 5 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.67
CADD
Benign
11
DANN
Benign
0.63

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.13
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs77732888; hg19: chr15-49088198; COSMIC: COSV57866607; COSMIC: COSV57866607; API