rs777768807
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The ENST00000369519.4(RBM20):c.3595G>A(p.Glu1199Lys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000316 in 1,549,984 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E1199D) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000369519.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBM20 | NM_001134363.3 | c.3595G>A | p.Glu1199Lys | missense_variant | 14/14 | ENST00000369519.4 | NP_001127835.2 | |
RBM20 | XM_017016103.3 | c.3430G>A | p.Glu1144Lys | missense_variant | 14/14 | XP_016871592.1 | ||
RBM20 | XM_017016104.3 | c.3211G>A | p.Glu1071Lys | missense_variant | 14/14 | XP_016871593.1 | ||
RBM20 | XM_047425116.1 | c.3211G>A | p.Glu1071Lys | missense_variant | 14/14 | XP_047281072.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBM20 | ENST00000369519.4 | c.3595G>A | p.Glu1199Lys | missense_variant | 14/14 | 1 | NM_001134363.3 | ENSP00000358532 | P1 | |
RBM20 | ENST00000465774.2 | n.536G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/2 | 4 | |||||
RBM20 | ENST00000480343.2 | n.228G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/3 | 4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000788 AC: 12AN: 152198Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000265 AC: 4AN: 150820Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000125 AC XY: 1AN XY: 80250
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000265 AC: 37AN: 1397786Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000232 AC XY: 16AN XY: 689470
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000788 AC: 12AN: 152198Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74350
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1DD Uncertain:2Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 19, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute | Feb 02, 2022 | Based on the classification scheme VCGS_Germline_v1.3.4, this variant is classified as VUS-3C. Following criteria are met: 0102 - Loss of function is a known mechanism of disease in this gene and is associated with dilated cardiomyopathy, 1DD (MIM#613172). While some publications suggest a dominant negative mechanism for variants in the hotspot affecting residues between 630 and 640 (PMID: 32187365, PMID: 29895960), this has been recently disproven (PMID: 32840935). (I) 0107 - This gene is associated with autosomal dominant disease. (I) 0200 - Variant is predicted to result in a missense amino acid change from glutamic acid to lysine. (I) 0251 - This variant is heterozygous. (I) 0302 - Variant is present in gnomAD (v3) <0.001 for a dominant condition (12 heterozygotes, 0 homozygotes). (SP) 0503 - Missense variant consistently predicted to be tolerated by multiple in silico tools or not conserved in placental mammals with a minor amino acid change. (SB) 0604 - Variant is not located in an established domain, motif, hotspot or informative constraint region. (I) 0710 - Another missense variant comparable to the one identified in this case has inconclusive previous evidence for pathogenicity. An alternative change to an aspartic acid has been reported as VUS in ClinVar. (I) 0809 - Previous evidence of pathogenicity for this variant is inconclusive. This variant has been reported in two individuals with HCM and another individual with SIDS (PMID: 30847666, 32789579). It has also been reported as VUS in ClinVar. (I) 0905 - No published segregation evidence has been identified for this variant. (I) 1007 - No published functional evidence has been identified for this variant. (I) 1208 - Inheritance information for this variant is not currently available in this individual. (I) Legend: (SP) - Supporting pathogenic, (I) - Information, (SB) - Supporting benign - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 28, 2021 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 30, 2019 | Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; Reported in ClinVar as a variant of uncertain significance by other clinical laboratories (ClinVar Variant ID# 264207; Landrum et al., 2016); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30847666, 32789579) - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 27, 2023 | The p.E1199K variant (also known as c.3595G>A), located in coding exon 14 of the RBM20 gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 3595. The glutamic acid at codon 1199 is replaced by lysine, an amino acid with similar properties. This variant has been detected in individuals reported to have dilated cardiomyopathy, and has also been detected in a SIDS case; however, details were limited (van Lint FHM et al. Neth Heart J, 2019 Jun;27:304-309; Köffer J et al. Int J Legal Med, 2021 Jan;135:207-212). This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species; however, lysine is the reference amino acid in one species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence for this variant is limited at this time, its clinical significance is unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at