rs78388808
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS2
The NM_006516.4(SLC2A1):c.777C>T(p.Ile259=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00115 in 1,613,808 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 3 hom. )
Consequence
SLC2A1
NM_006516.4 synonymous
NM_006516.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.622
Genes affected
SLC2A1 (HGNC:11005): (solute carrier family 2 member 1) This gene encodes a major glucose transporter in the mammalian blood-brain barrier. The encoded protein is found primarily in the cell membrane and on the cell surface, where it can also function as a receptor for human T-cell leukemia virus (HTLV) I and II. Mutations in this gene have been found in a family with paroxysmal exertion-induced dyskinesia. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).
BP6
Variant 1-42929683-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-42929683-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 95417.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr1-42929683-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr1-42929683-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.622 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC2A1 | NM_006516.4 | c.777C>T | p.Ile259= | synonymous_variant | 6/10 | ENST00000426263.10 | NP_006507.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC2A1 | ENST00000426263.10 | c.777C>T | p.Ile259= | synonymous_variant | 6/10 | 1 | NM_006516.4 | ENSP00000416293 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000664 AC: 101AN: 152182Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
101
AN:
152182
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000713 AC: 179AN: 251084Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000752 AC XY: 102AN XY: 135706
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
179
AN:
251084
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
102
AN XY:
135706
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00120 AC: 1752AN: 1461508Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00120 AC XY: 869AN XY: 727056
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1752
AN:
1461508
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
869
AN XY:
727056
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000663 AC: 101AN: 152300Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000564 AC XY: 42AN XY: 74476
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
101
AN:
152300
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
42
AN XY:
74476
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Oct 09, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2024 | SLC2A1: BP4, BP7 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Aug 08, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Encephalopathy due to GLUT1 deficiency Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jul 07, 2014 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 31, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Dystonia 9 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 18, 2017 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
GLUT1 deficiency syndrome 1, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 24, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at