rs78388808

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_006516.4(SLC2A1):c.777C>T(p.Ile259Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00115 in 1,613,808 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

SLC2A1
NM_006516.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.622

Publications

3 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

SLC2A1 (HGNC:11005): (solute carrier family 2 member 1) This gene encodes a major glucose transporter in the mammalian blood-brain barrier. The encoded protein is found primarily in the cell membrane and on the cell surface, where it can also function as a receptor for human T-cell leukemia virus (HTLV) I and II. Mutations in this gene have been found in a family with paroxysmal exertion-induced dyskinesia. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2013]

SLC2A1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

encephalopathy due to GLUT1 deficiency
Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet
GLUT1 deficiency syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
childhood onset GLUT1 deficiency syndrome 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet
dystonia 9
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
epilepsy, idiopathic generalized, susceptibility to, 12
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
childhood absence epilepsy
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
hereditary cryohydrocytosis with reduced stomatin
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
myoclonic-astatic epilepsy
Inheritance: Unknown Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

SLC2A1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).

BP6

Variant 1-42929683-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-42929683-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 95417.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.622 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000663 (101/152300) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.001 (68/68018). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000808. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 42 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AD,AR,Unknown gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SLC2A1	NM_006516.4 link	c.777C>T	p.Ile259Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 10	ENST00000426263.10	NP_006507.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SLC2A1	ENST00000426263.10 link	c.777C>T	p.Ile259Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 10	1	NM_006516.4	ENSP00000416293.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000664

AC:

101

AN:

152182

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000338

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000916

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000621

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00100

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000956

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000713

AC:

179

AN:

251084

AF XY:

0.000752

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000308

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000463

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000937

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00115

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00120

AC:

1752

AN:

1461508

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00120

AC XY:

869

AN XY:

727056

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000299

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000492

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000788

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000113

AC:

AN:

53152

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00143

AC:

1588

AN:

1111904

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000960

AC:

AN:

60386

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.508

Heterozygous variant carriers

111

222

332

443

554

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

128

192

256

320

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000663

AC:

101

AN:

152300

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000564

AC XY:

AN XY:

74476

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000337

AC:

AN:

41568

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000915

AC:

AN:

15298

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5176

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000621

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10620

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00100

AC:

AN:

68018

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000946

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.492

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000610

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000722

EpiCase

AF:

0.000981

EpiControl

AF:

0.00142

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:4

Aug 08, 2017

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

SLC2A1: BP4, BP7 -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 09, 2018

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Encephalopathy due to GLUT1 deficiency

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Jul 07, 2014

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Oct 31, 2013

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Dystonia 9

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Sep 18, 2017

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

GLUT1 deficiency syndrome 1, autosomal recessive

Benign:1

Jan 22, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.45

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.88

PhyloP100

0.62

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over