rs78525896

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001194998.2(CEP152):​c.1577+6G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00176 in 1,612,486 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 44 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0095 ( 25 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00095 ( 19 hom. )

Consequence

CEP152
NM_001194998.2 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00009308
2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.275

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CEP152 (HGNC:29298): (centrosomal protein 152) This gene encodes a protein that is thought to be involved with centrosome function. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary microcephaly (MCPH4). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
CEP152 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • microcephaly with or without short stature
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Seckel syndrome 5
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • microcephaly 9, primary, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • autosomal recessive primary microcephaly
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Seckel syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 15-48781190-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-48781190-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 158229.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00954 (1452/152242) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.033 (1371/41524). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0316. There are 25 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 662 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 25 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CEP152NM_001194998.2 linkc.1577+6G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 12 of 26 ENST00000380950.7 NP_001181927.1 O94986-4Q3B7A2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CEP152ENST00000380950.7 linkc.1577+6G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 12 of 26 1 NM_001194998.2 ENSP00000370337.2 O94986-4
CEP152ENST00000399334.7 linkc.1577+6G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 12 of 25 1 ENSP00000382271.3 O94986-3
CEP152ENST00000325747.9 linkc.1298+6G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 11 of 24 1 ENSP00000321000.5 O94986-1
CEP152ENST00000560322.5 linkn.1577+6G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 12 of 12 1 ENSP00000453440.1 A0A075B719

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00951
AC:
1446
AN:
152124
Hom.:
24
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0330
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00386
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000882
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00669
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00240
AC:
599
AN:
249154
AF XY:
0.00172
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0347
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00139
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000265
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00166
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000951
AC:
1389
AN:
1460244
Hom.:
19
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000805
AC XY:
585
AN XY:
726568
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0337
AC:
1127
AN:
33422
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00159
AC:
71
AN:
44692
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26092
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39534
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000128
AC:
11
AN:
86228
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53324
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000695
AC:
4
AN:
5754
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000225
AC:
25
AN:
1110878
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00250
AC:
151
AN:
60320
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.469
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
65
131
196
262
327
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
36
72
108
144
180
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00954
AC:
1452
AN:
152242
Hom.:
25
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00889
AC XY:
662
AN XY:
74432
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0330
AC:
1371
AN:
41524
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00386
AC:
59
AN:
15288
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5190
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10610
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000882
AC:
6
AN:
68016
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00662
AC:
14
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
74
147
221
294
368
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00497
Hom.:
11
Bravo
AF:
0.0113
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00145
AC:
5
AN:
3470
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Apr 27, 2017
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 15, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified Benign:1
Feb 15, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Microcephaly 9, primary, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

CEP152-related disorder Benign:1
Dec 24, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Seckel syndrome 5 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.79
CADD
Benign
0.70
DANN
Benign
0.63
PhyloP100
-0.28
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Mutation Taster
=97/3
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000093
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0060
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs78525896; hg19: chr15-49073387; API