Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_000368.5(TSC1):āc.1335A>Gā(p.Glu445=) variant causes a splice region, synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.143 in 1,613,436 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 17,073 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. EE445G?) has been classified as Pathogenic.
TSC1 (HGNC:12362): (TSC complex subunit 1) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein hamartin. The encoded protein interacts with and stabilizes the GTPase activating protein tuberin. This hamartin-tuberin complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. This protein also functions as a co-chaperone for Hsp90 that inhibits its ATPase activity. This protein functions as a facilitator of Hsp90-mediated folding of kinase and non-kinase clients, including TSC2 and thereby preventing their ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.46).
BP6
Variant 9-132906834-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-132906834-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 48768.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-132906834-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.929 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.209 is higher than 0.05.
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
-
- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided
clinical testing
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
-
Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided
clinical testing
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
-
- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Jul 31, 2014
- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
GeneDx
Oct 07, 2013
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Feb 21, 2013
Glu445Glu in exon 14 of TSC1: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located with in the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 21.9% (965/4406) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequenci ng Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs7862221). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
-
- -
Tuberous sclerosis 1 Benign:7
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Division of Genomic Medicine, Department of Advanced Medicine, Medical Research Institute, Kanazawa Medical University
Jul 10, 2020
- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Jan 12, 2018
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Feb 01, 2024
- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Jul 07, 2023
- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Genome-Nilou Lab
Nov 07, 2021
- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Mar 28, 2019
- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Athena Diagnostics
Apr 14, 2017
- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Nov 22, 2023
- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
May 26, 2016
Variant summary: The TSC1 c.1335A>G (p.Glu445Glu) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change 2 nucleotides from the exon14-intron13 boundary. One in silico tool predicts a polymorphism outcome for this variant. 5/5 Alamut algorithms predict no significant change to the cononical splice acceptor site, while 2/5 predict a strengthening of a cryptic splice acceptor site. This variant was found in 16480/120190 control chromosomes (1225 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.1371162, which is approximately 5485 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic TSC1 variant (0.000025), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories classified this variant as benign, and it has been reported in the literature as a normal population variant (PMID: 18538015). Taken together and based on the high allele frequency in the general population, this variant is classified as Benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
not provided
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
-
- -
Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:1Other:1
not provided, no classification provided
curation
Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC1)
-
- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Feb 05, 2024
- -
Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Jan 12, 2018
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Ambry Genetics
Nov 19, 2014
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -