Menu
GeneBe

rs794728591

Variant summary

Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points: 10P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP2PP3_ModeratePP5

The NM_170707.4(LMNA):c.646C>T(p.Arg216Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000558 in 1,614,056 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R216H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: đť‘“ 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes đť‘“: 0.0000055 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

LMNA
NM_170707.4 missense

Scores

15
3
1

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:6U:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.65
Variant links:
Genes affected
LMNA (HGNC:6636): (lamin A/C) The protein encoded by this gene is part of the nuclear lamina, a two-dimensional matrix of proteins located next to the inner nuclear membrane. The lamin family of proteins make up the matrix and are highly conserved in evolution. During mitosis, the lamina matrix is reversibly disassembled as the lamin proteins are phosphorylated. Lamin proteins are thought to be involved in nuclear stability, chromatin structure and gene expression. Vertebrate lamins consist of two types, A and B. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. Mutations in this gene lead to several diseases: Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy, familial partial lipodystrophy, limb girdle muscular dystrophy, dilated cardiomyopathy, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, and Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 5 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 0 benign, 12 uncertain in NM_170707.4
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PM5
Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr1-156134812-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_pathogenic].
PP2
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, LMNA
PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.894
PP5
Variant 1-156134811-C-T is Pathogenic according to our data. Variant chr1-156134811-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 200938.We mark this variant Likely_pathogenic, oryginal submissions are: {Pathogenic=3, Likely_pathogenic=3, Uncertain_significance=1}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
LMNANM_170707.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.646C>T p.Arg216Cys missense_variant 4/12 ENST00000368300.9
LMNANM_005572.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.646C>T p.Arg216Cys missense_variant 4/10 ENST00000677389.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
LMNAENST00000368300.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.646C>T p.Arg216Cys missense_variant 4/121 NM_170707.4 P1P02545-1
LMNAENST00000677389.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.646C>T p.Arg216Cys missense_variant 4/10 NM_005572.4 P02545-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00000657
AC:
1
AN:
152174
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00000398
AC:
1
AN:
251080
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00000736
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
135872
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000547
AC:
8
AN:
1461882
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00000413
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
727240
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000450
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000166
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00000657
AC:
1
AN:
152174
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000135
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74326
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000712
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00000378

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:6Uncertain:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Pathogenic:1Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedprovider interpretationStanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford UniversityAug 17, 2017p.Arg216Cys (R216C; c.646C>T) in exon 4 of the LMNA gene (NM_005572.3) Given the suspicious case data and rarity in the general population, we consider this variant a variant of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic. At this time, we do not feel it is suitable for assessing risk in healthy relatives ("predictive genetic testing"). However, if the patient is able to get her family involved for segregation analysis and it segregates with disease, this variant is a good candidate for pathogenicity. The variant has been seen in at least 13 unrelated cases of cardiomyopathy (not including this patient's family). Most of these patients were seen at other genetic testing labs. Some of these patients have conduction system disease and a family history of sudden cardiac death. The case data is strong; however, segregation and functional data is lacking in any of these families, which leads us to a classification of VUS-likely pathogenic. We have seen this variant in 3 of our patients - one with cardiomyopathy, family history of sudden cardiac death/arrest, conduction system disease, arrhythmias, another with severe dilated cardiomyopathy and a family history of DCM, and another with recurrent VT and family history of VT/SVT and older-onset cardiomyopathy. This variant has been reported in one patient who is part of a multicenter cohort of 269 LMNA-positive individuals recruited in Europe with clinical or family evidence of laminopathy (van Rijsingen I et al., 2013). Ancestry is not provided. Subjects were recruited in Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, UK. The variant was also report in a paper on ablation for laminopathy, however the case amy be redundant with that reported by van Rijsingen et al given overlap in authors and recruitment sites and lack of details to assess potential redundancy. The variant is listed in an LMNA database online, but I can't open the variant's listing (http://www.umd.be/LMNA/W_glossary/Glossary_80C7.shtml). Ito et al (2017) included this variant in some analyses in their paper on impact of LMNA variants on splicing, however it appears it was only evaluated with an in silico algorithm and was not studied further. This is a non-conservative amino acid change, resulting in the replacement of a basic Arginine with a polar Cysteine that is capable of forming disulfide bridges. The Arginine at this location is very highly conserved across vertebrate species (it is an Asparagine in one species of bird and a Histidine in lamprey). Variants in nearby residues (F206L, I210S, L215P, L215V, K219N, K219T, H222P, H222Y, E223K, R225Q, L226V) have been reported in HGMD in association with dilated cardiomyopathy and/or muscular dystrophy, further supporting the functional importance of this region of the protein. According to the Ambry report, in silico analysis with PolyPhen predicts the variant to be “Probably Damaging” with a score of 0.97 and SIFT predicts it to be “Deleterious” with a score of (0.01). Its Grantham score is 180. According to the Invitae report, SIFT, PolyPhen-2, and Align-GVGD all suggest the variant is disruptive. The variant was reported online in 2 of 138585 individuals in the Genome Aggregation Consortium Dataset (gnomAD; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/), which currently includes variant calls on >140,000 unrelated individuals of African, Asian, European, Ashkenazi, Latino descent. Specifically, the variant was observed in 1 of 10152 individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent (MAF=0.009850%) and 1 of 15391 South Asians (MAF=0.003249%). The phenotype of those individuals is not publicly available. The dataset is comprised of multiple cohorts, some of which were recruited from the general population, others were enriched for common cardiovascular disease. There is one individual of “Other” ancestry with a different variant at the same codon: p.Arg216His. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Dec 04, 2015- -
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 22, 2022Originally reported in one individual who had either clinical or familial evidence of a laminopathy, though specific details were not provided (van Riksingen et al., 2013).; Has been reported in association with a cardiomyopathy or arrhythmia phenotype in multiple unrelated individuals referred for genetic testing at GeneDx, and in published literature (Chen et al., 2018; Armaroli et al., 2020); Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32155092, 23183350, 29943882, 30007954, 28878402, 33673806, 30078822, 34975533, 10939567) -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 15, 2024This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 216 of the LMNA protein (p.Arg216Cys). This variant is present in population databases (rs794728591, gnomAD 0.01%). This missense change has been observed in individuals with conduction disease and/or dilated cardiomyopathy (PMID: 23183350, 27506821, 28878402, 29237675, 29943882, 30007954). It has also been observed to segregate with disease in related individuals. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 200938). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt LMNA protein function with a positive predictive value of 95%. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects LMNA function (PMID: 28878402). For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. -
Primary dilated cardiomyopathy;C5392094:Laminopathy Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJun 29, 2018The p.Arg216Cys variant in LMNA has been reported at least 10 individuals with c ardiomyopathy or other features suggestive of a laminopathy (Al-Saaidi 2018, van Rijsingen 2013, Ambry pers. comm., BluePrint pers. comm, EGL pers. comm., GeneD x pers. comm., Invitae pers. comm., Stanford pers. comm., LMM data) and segregat ed with disease in 18 affected individuals from one large family with DCM (Al-Sa aidi 2018). It has also been identified in 2/277170 chromosomes by the Genome Ag gregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org) and has been repor ted in ClinVar (Variation ID:200938). Computational prediction tools and conserv ation analysis suggest that the p.Arg216Cys variant may impact the protein, thou gh this information is not predictive enough to determine pathogenicity. In summ ary, although additional studies are required to fully establish its clinical si gnificance, the p.Arg216Cys variant is likely pathogenic. ACMG/AMP Criteria appl ied: PP1_Strong, PS4_Moderate, PM2, PP3. -
Primary familial dilated cardiomyopathy Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpOct 02, 2021Variant summary: LMNA c.646C>T (p.Arg216Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Intermediate filament, rod domain (IPR039008) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4e-06 in 251080 control chromosomes. c.646C>T has been widely reported in the literature in multiple comprehensively genotyped individuals affected with a variety of cardiac phenotypes such as, unspecified cardiac disease (van Rijsingen_2013), confirmed LMNA cardiomyopathy (Kumar_2016), RVA pacing induced HF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (Liu_2017), Atrial Firbillation and Atrioventricular block (Nishiuchi_2017), co-segregation with disease among all affected family members with DCM features of arrythmia and/or cardiomegaly (Chen_2018) and a comprehensively genotyped laboratory referral genetic testing cohort with suspected clinical diagnosis of HCM (Hathaway_2021). These data indicate that the variant is very likely to be associated with disease. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function. The most pronounced variant effect results in disrupted Lamin A/C nuclear location and increased apoptotic rate under environmental stress of serum starvation in a neonatal rat cardiomyocyte cell system (example, Liu_2017). Seven clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic, n=5; VUS, n=2). Some submitters cite overlapping evidence utilized in the context of this evaluation. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as pathogenic. -
Primary dilated cardiomyopathy Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBlueprint GeneticsMar 19, 2015- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 05, 2019The p.R216C pathogenic mutation (also known as c.646C>T), located in coding exon 4 of the LMNA gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 646. The arginine at codon 216 is replaced by cysteine, an amino acid with highly dissimilar properties. This alteration has been identified in multiple individuals with dilated cardiomyopathy, cardiac conduction disease, and/or other laminopathy phenotypes, and it has been shown to segregate with disease in two large families (van Rijsingen IA et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2013;15(4):376-84; Kumar S et al. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9:e004357; Nishiuchi S et al. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2017;10:e001603; Al-Saaidi RA et al. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2018;ejhf.1241; Chen L et al. J Biomed Res, 2018 Jul;32:314-316; BluePrint pers. comm.; EGL pers. comm.; GeneDx pers. comm.; LMM pers. comm.; Invitae pers. comm.; Stanford pers. comm., Ambry Internal Data). In one study, neonatal rat cardiomyocytes expressing p.R216C exhibited differences in the size and distribution of lamin aggregates compared with cardiomyocytes expressing wildtype LMNA (Liu N et al. Sci Rep. 2017;7:10676). In a second study, authors showed reduced efficiency of incorporation of this alteration in the cytoskeletal fraction of patient fibroblasts (Al-Saaidi RA et al. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2018;ejhf.1241). Based on the supporting evidence, this alteration is interpreted as a disease-causing mutation. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.73
CardioboostCm
Uncertain
0.75
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.37
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.39
Cadd
Pathogenic
33
Dann
Pathogenic
1.0
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.68
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.64
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.95
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.99
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.62
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
0.89
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
0.80
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
2.9
M;.;M;M;M;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.85
D
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-6.0
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.83
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0010
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;.;D;D;.;.;D;.;.
Vest4
0.90
MutPred
0.62
Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0067);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0067);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0067);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0067);Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0067);.;.;.;.;
MVP
0.98
MPC
2.4
ClinPred
1.0
D
GERP RS
5.3
RBP_binding_hub_radar
1.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.8
Varity_R
0.65
gMVP
0.94

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs794728591; hg19: chr1-156104602; COSMIC: COSV105905866; COSMIC: COSV105905866; API