Menu
GeneBe

rs80358251

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM5BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000271.5(NPC1):c.709C>T(p.Pro237Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0134 in 1,614,168 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 195 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P237L) has been classified as Pathogenic.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.010 ( 17 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.014 ( 178 hom. )

Consequence

NPC1
NM_000271.5 missense

Scores

1
6
11

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:14O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.19
Variant links:
Genes affected
NPC1 (HGNC:7897): (NPC intracellular cholesterol transporter 1) This gene encodes a large protein that resides in the limiting membrane of endosomes and lysosomes and mediates intracellular cholesterol trafficking via binding of cholesterol to its N-terminal domain. It is predicted to have a cytoplasmic C-terminus, 13 transmembrane domains, and 3 large loops in the lumen of the endosome - the last loop being at the N-terminus. This protein transports low-density lipoproteins to late endosomal/lysosomal compartments where they are hydrolized and released as free cholesterol. Defects in this gene cause Niemann-Pick type C disease, a rare autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by over accumulation of cholesterol and glycosphingolipids in late endosomal/lysosomal compartments.[provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

PM5
Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr18-23560402-G-A is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.013225466).
BP6
Variant 18-23560403-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr18-23560403-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 21142.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=6, Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=2, not_provided=1}. Variant chr18-23560403-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr18-23560403-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.01 (1528/152344) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0162 (1100/68034). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0154. There are 17 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 720 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 17 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
NPC1NM_000271.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.709C>T p.Pro237Ser missense_variant 6/25 ENST00000269228.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
NPC1ENST00000269228.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.709C>T p.Pro237Ser missense_variant 6/251 NM_000271.5 P1O15118-1
NPC1ENST00000540608.5 linkuse as main transcriptn.623C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 4/162

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0101
AC:
1530
AN:
152226
Hom.:
17
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00277
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00543
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00461
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00103
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0186
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0162
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00621
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00988
AC:
2478
AN:
250694
Hom.:
26
AF XY:
0.00961
AC XY:
1302
AN XY:
135546
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00296
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00370
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00289
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000850
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0177
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0159
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0105
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0138
AC:
20169
AN:
1461824
Hom.:
178
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0133
AC XY:
9695
AN XY:
727222
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00212
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00423
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00314
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00103
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0198
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0161
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0120
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0100
AC:
1528
AN:
152344
Hom.:
17
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00966
AC XY:
720
AN XY:
74510
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00277
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00542
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00461
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000828
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0186
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0162
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00614
Alfa
AF:
0.0140
Hom.:
20
Bravo
AF:
0.00840
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0202
AC:
75
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0150
AC:
58
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00295
AC:
13
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0159
AC:
137
ExAC
AF:
0.0104
AC:
1263
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
6
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0144
EpiControl
AF:
0.0133

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:14Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Niemann-Pick disease, type C1 Uncertain:1Benign:5Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSIB Swiss Institute of BioinformaticsMay 31, 2018This variant is interpreted as a Benign, for Niemann-Pick disease, type C1, in Autosomal Recessive manner. The following ACMG Tag(s) were applied: BS3 => Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing (PMID:12554680). BS1 => Allele frequency is greater than expected for disorder (PMID:11182931). BS2 => Observed in a healthy adult individual for a recessive (homozygous), dominant (heterozygous), or X-linked (hemizygous) disorder, with full penetrance expected at an early age. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical CenterSep 07, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabMay 18, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterliterature onlyCounsylAug 22, 2014- -
not provided, no classification providedliterature onlyGeneReviews-- -
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jul 24, 2015- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32222928, 29631617, 28328115, 25842391, 10480349, 20981092, 12955717, 12554680, 22995991, 25497598, 20489167) -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicFeb 21, 2018- -
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 11, 2023- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.10
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.096
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.11
Cadd
Benign
21
Dann
Benign
0.85
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.43
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.12
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.012
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.87
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.013
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.22
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.2
M
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.47
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.2
N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.40
Sift
Benign
0.41
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.52
T
Polyphen
0.0030
B
Vest4
0.42
MPC
0.27
ClinPred
0.076
T
GERP RS
5.9
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.18
gMVP
0.73

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80358251; hg19: chr18-21140367; COSMIC: COSV99036290; COSMIC: COSV99036290; API