rs80358930

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.7051G>A(p.Ala2351Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000026 in 1,613,370 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A2351G) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000046 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000024 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:11B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.252

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.064841926).

BP6

Variant 13-32354904-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32354904-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 52256.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=9, Benign=1}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
BRCA2	NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.7051G>A	p.Ala2351Thr	missense_variant	14/27	ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
BRCA2	ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcript	c.7051G>A	p.Ala2351Thr	missense_variant	14/27	5	NM_000059.4	A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000460

AC:

AN:

152078

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000386

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000479

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000439

AC:

AN:

250694

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000369

AC XY:

AN XY:

135572

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000290

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000197

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000264

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000240

AC:

AN:

1461174

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000234

AC XY:

AN XY:

726886

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.000126

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000929

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000162

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000331

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000460

AC:

AN:

152196

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000403

AC XY:

AN XY:

74386

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000387

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000474

Alfa

AF:

0.0000329

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000264

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000270

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000576

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:11Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2

Uncertain:3

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital	Oct 06, 2022	The BRCA2 c.7051G>A (p.Ala2351Thr) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.020% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). The in silico tool REVEL is inconclusive about a pathogenic or benign effect of this variant on protein function, and to our knowledge functional studies have not been performed. This variant has been reported in individuals with breast and ovarian cancer (PMID: 18284688, 21965345) and a case-control study indicated that individuals with this variant had an increased risk of developing breast cancer with an odds ratio of 1.6 (PMID: 30287823). However, this variant has also been reported in individuals who harbored a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (UMD, NHGRI BIC databases). This variant is absent in the FLOSSIES database, which contains genetic variants from women older than 70 years of age who have never had cancer (https://whi.color.com/). To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with Fanconi anemia. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)	May 29, 2002	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Laboratorio de Genetica e Diagnostico Molecular, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein	Mar 03, 2022	ACMG classification criteria: BP4 supporting -

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Feb 26, 2020	In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with early onset breast cancer or ovarian cancer (Lee 2008, Akbari 2011); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 10923033, 31131967, 30287823, 28111427, 21965345, 18284688, 25348012, 25583476) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano	Jun 14, 2023	In the published literature, this variant has been reported in individuals with breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMIDs: 21965345 (2011), 30287823 (2018), 31907386 (2020), 34218100 (2021), 33471991 (2021), and 35464868 (2022)), gastric cancer (PMID: 25583476 (2015)). The variant has also been observed in unaffected individuals (PMIDs: 30287823 (2018) and 33471991 (2021)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.0002 (6/30498 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -

Familial cancer of breast

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Baylor Genetics	Feb 14, 2024	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	MGZ Medical Genetics Center	Feb 09, 2024	ACMG codes applied following ENIGMA VCEP rules: BP1_STR, BS1_SUP; BP5_MOD -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Mar 29, 2024	The p.A2351T variant (also known as c.7051G>A), located in coding exon 13 of the BRCA2 gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 7051. The alanine at codon 2351 is replaced by threonine, an amino acid with similar properties. This alteration has been reported with a carrier frequency of 4 in 7,051 unselected breast cancer patients and 4 in 11,241 female controls of Japanese ancestry (Momozawa Y et al. Nat Commun. 2018 10;9:4083). This alteration has also been reported in 1 of 1345 ovarian cancer patients (Akbari MR et al. J. Med. Genet. 2011 Nov;48:783-6) and in a cohort of 1469 early-onset breast cancer patients (Lee E et al. Breast Cancer Res. 2008 Mar;10:R19). This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Feb 02, 2017	- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State	Nov 16, 2021	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Dec 08, 2023	- -

Medulloblastoma;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C1838457:Fanconi anemia complementation group D1;C2675520:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2;C2751641:Glioma susceptibility 3;C3150546:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Oct 31, 2018

- -

not specified

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Dec 04, 2020

Variant summary: BRCA2 c.7051G>A (p.Ala2351Thr) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 6.7e-05 in 298156 control chromosomes (gnomAD). This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in BRCA2 causing Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (6.7e-05 vs 0.00075), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.7051G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with breast or ovarian cancer (example: Akbari_2011, Lee_2008, Momozawa_2018, Park_2020) as well as in controls (Momozawa_2018). These reports however, do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variants have been reported in UMD and NHGRI BIC databases (BRCA2 c.1723A>T, p.Lys575X; BRCA1 c.2411_2412delAG, p.Gln804Leufs), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Eight ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as uncertain significance (n=7) or likely benign (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -

Medulloblastoma;C0040588:Tracheoesophageal fistula;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C1838457:Fanconi anemia complementation group D1;C2675520:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2;C2751641:Glioma susceptibility 3;C3150546:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

May 23, 2017

- -

Malignant tumor of breast

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

The BRCA2 p.Ala2351Thr variant was identified by Akbari (2011) in an individual with ovarian cancer. The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80358930) â€šÃ„ÃºWith unknown alleleâ€šÃ„Ã¹, and in the BIC database (4X with unknown clinical importance). The variant was also identified the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database (released Oct 20th, 2014) in 7 of 120970 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0000) (or 4 South Asian, 1 East Asian, 2 European (Non-Finnish) individuals) and none from a population of Other/African/Latino/European (Finnish) individuals; COSMIC, the ClinVar database (classified as a uncertain significance by BIC, classified as uncertain significance by Ambry Genetics, and classification not provided by Invitae) and UMD (3X as a 3-unclassified variant). In UMD the variant was identified with a co-occurring pathogenic BRCA2 variant (c.1723A>T, p.Lys575X), increasing the likelihood that the p.Ala2351Thr variant does not have clinical significance. In addition, Myriad classifies this variant as a polymorphism (personal communication).The BRCA2 IARC database notes that there is a weak/null probability of creating a de novo splice donor at nt #7046 and a weak/null probability to create a de novo splice acceptor at nt #7063. The p.Ala2351 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact of the variant amino acid on the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.070

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.22

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.27

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

Eigen

Benign

-0.52

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.57

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.049

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.12

MetaRNN

Benign

0.065

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.86

MutationTaster

Benign

1.0

N;N

PrimateAI

Benign

0.20

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.90

N;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.35

Sift

Benign

0.14

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.34

T;T

Vest4

0.089

MVP

0.88

MPC

0.072

ClinPred

0.081

GERP RS

1.9

gMVP

0.17

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over