rs80359051

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.8090G>A(p.Ser2697Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000186 in 1,614,034 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S2697S) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000046 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000016 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:16

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.01

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.058985263).

BP6

Variant 13-32363292-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32363292-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 52503.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Benign=5, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr13-32363292-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	NM_000059.4 link	c.8090G>A	p.Ser2697Asn	missense_variant	Exon 18 of 27	ENST00000380152.8	NP_000050.3	P51587

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	ENST00000380152.8 link	c.8090G>A	p.Ser2697Asn	missense_variant	Exon 18 of 27	5	NM_000059.4	ENSP00000369497.3	P51587
BRCA2	ENST00000530893.7 link	c.7721G>A	p.Ser2574Asn	missense_variant	Exon 18 of 27	1		ENSP00000499438.2	A0A590UJI7
BRCA2	ENST00000614259.2 link	n.*148G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 17 of 26	2		ENSP00000506251.1	A0A7P0TAP7
BRCA2	ENST00000614259 link	n.*148G>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 17 of 25	2		ENSP00000506251.1	A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000460

AC:

AN:

152174

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000385

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000398

AC:

AN:

251314

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000368

AC XY:

AN XY:

135820

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000272

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000440

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000157

AC:

AN:

1461860

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000193

AC XY:

AN XY:

727224

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.000126

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000144

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000166

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000460

AC:

AN:

152174

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74338

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000385

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000501

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000416

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000494

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:16

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:6

Jan 07, 2020

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 03, 2021

Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

BRCA2: BP1, BP4 -

Jun 21, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26689913, 28111427, 19043619, 25111659, 20104584, 28324225, 25348012, 20167696, 32444794, 29884841, 27535533, 12228710, 31131967) -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2

Uncertain:2Benign:2

Feb 20, 2004

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2012

Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 07, 2017

Counsyl

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 21, 2016

Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:3

Aug 30, 2019

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 17, 2022

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: BRCA2 c.8090G>A (p.Ser2697Asn) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of four in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4e-05 in 251314 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in BRCA2 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (4e-05 vs 0.00075), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.8090G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Co-occurrences with one pathogenic variant have been reported in multiple individuals (BRCA2 c.1800T>G, p.Tyr600Ter, BIC and UMD databases; BRCA1, c.2138C>G, p.Ser713Ter, internal database), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Ten clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (benign/likely benign n=7, VUS n=3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Jan 21, 2025

Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

BS1, BS3, BP5_Strong c.8090G>A, located in exon 18 of the BRCA2 gene, is predicted to result in the substitution of Ser by Asn at codon 2697, p.(Ser2697Asn). It was found in 5/17684 alleles,with a filter allele frequency of 0.011% at 95% confidence, within the East Asian population in the gnomAD v2.1 (non-cancer, exome only subset) (BS1). This position is located in a (potentially) clinically important functional domain. SpliceAI algorithm predicts no significant impact on splicing but the Bayesdel no-AF meta-predictor score for this variant (0.258) suggests an intermediate effect on the protein function. This variant has been reported by calibrated studies to affect protein function similar to benign control variants (PMIDs: 33609447, 32444794, 29884841) (BS3). Published clinical data for a multifactorial likelihood analysis (PMID: 31131967) showed a combined LR=0,046 (BP5_Strong). This variant has been reported in ClinVar (6x benign, 9x likely benign, 4x uncertain significance) and LOVD (4x likely benign, 5x uncertain significance) databases, and in BRCA Exchange database as not yet reviewed. Based on currently available information, the variant c.8090G>A should be considered a benign variant. -

Jan 22, 2016

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 29, 2020

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer

Uncertain:1

Jul 15, 2019

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial cancer of breast

Benign:1

Center for Precision Medicine, Meizhou People's Hospital

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: literature only

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 21, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.075

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.25

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.29

CADD

Benign

7.4

DANN

Benign

0.47

Eigen

Benign

-0.93

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.93

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.10

M_CAP

Benign

0.063

MetaRNN

Benign

0.059

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.95

PrimateAI

Benign

0.27

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.17

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.26

Sift

Benign

0.43

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.69

T;T

Vest4

0.23

MVP

0.84

MPC

0.019

ClinPred

0.017

GERP RS

0.53

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

gMVP

0.23

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over