Menu
GeneBe

rs80359224

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.9509A>G(p.Asp3170Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000929 in 1,613,984 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D3170E) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000096 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

1
2
13

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.328
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.23257378).
BP6
Variant 13-32396905-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32396905-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 52861.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32396905-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr13-32396905-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.9509A>G p.Asp3170Gly missense_variant 26/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.9509A>G p.Asp3170Gly missense_variant 26/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00000657
AC:
1
AN:
152202
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00000398
AC:
1
AN:
251308
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
135826
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000880
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000958
AC:
14
AN:
1461782
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000138
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
727194
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000117
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000166
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00000657
AC:
1
AN:
152202
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
74354
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000329
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000113
ExAC
AF:
0.00000824
AC:
1

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:17
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesAug 06, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalFeb 06, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpSep 13, 2021Variant summary: BRCA2 c.9509A>G (p.Asp3170Gly) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the OB3 fold (IPR015188) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4e-06 in 251308 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. In a recent large study evaluating breast cancer cases and controls in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC), the variant was reported in 3/60466 cases, but was also found in 4/53461 controls (Dorling_2021 through LOVD). Publications also reported experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, and demonstrated similar homology-directed DNA damage repair (HDR) activity to the wild-type (Mesman_2018, Guidugli_2018). Multifactorial probability models, performing systematic assessments of variants of unknown significance in the BRCA genes, which included analysis of co-occurrence in trans with known deleterious mutations, personal and family history of cancer, tumor pathology and co-segregation with disease in pedigrees, predicted this variant to be neutral (Easton 2007 and Lindor 2012). Karchin_2008 classified variant as neutral based on protein likelihood ratio classification. Seven other submitters, including an expert panel (ENIGMA), have provided clinical-significance assessments for this variant in ClinVar after 2014, and classified the variant as likely benign (n=4) / benign (n=3; including the expert panel). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJan 29, 2021- -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)May 29, 2002- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthDec 18, 2023- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Aug 10, 2015IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.0000264 -
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 09, 2019This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24323938, 21990134, 17924331, 18951446, 19043619, 18951436, 29394989, 29988080, 29884841) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJun 01, 2022BRCA2: BP1, BP4, BS3:Supporting -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jan 19, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 19, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthSep 11, 2017- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Sep 12, 2022- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeOct 13, 2023- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioNov 29, 2021- -
BRCA2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesNov 06, 2023This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA2 p.Asp3170Gly variant was identified in the literature however the frequency of this variant in an affected population was not provided (Easton 2007, Karchin 2008, Guidugli 2018, Lindor 2012). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs80359224) as "With other allele", in ClinVar (classified as benign by Ambry Genetics, ENIGMA, Quest Diagnostics, and ARUP Laboratories; as likely benign by Gene Dx, Color; and as uncertain significance by BIC and Integrated Genetics), LOVD 3.0 (7 entries), and UMD-LSDB (2 entries). The variant was identified in control databases in 1 of 246074 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000004 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: European Non-Finnish in 1 of 111560 chromosomes (freq: 0.000009), while the variant was not observed in the African, Other, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, and South Asian populations. Several variant model prediction programs conclude that the p.Asp3170Gly variant is not pathogenic (Easton 2007, Karchin 2008, Lindor 2012). A homology-directed DNA repair (HDR) assay in V-C8 cultured cells concluded that this variant was comparable to wild type and was classified as neutral (Guidugli 2018). The Asp3170 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.092
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.17
D
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.0
Cadd
Benign
13
Dann
Benign
0.95
Eigen
Benign
-0.82
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.84
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.075
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.057
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.23
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.80
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.38
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.6
N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.55
Sift
Benign
0.12
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.18
T;T
Vest4
0.34
MutPred
0.68
Loss of stability (P = 0.0667);Loss of stability (P = 0.0667);
MVP
0.85
MPC
0.023
ClinPred
0.040
T
GERP RS
0.42
gMVP
0.38

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs80359224; hg19: chr13-32971042; API