Menu
GeneBe

rs8077577

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):c.9486C>T(p.Asp3162=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.185 in 1,613,840 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 29,024 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.19 ( 2857 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.18 ( 26167 hom. )

Consequence

MYO15A
NM_016239.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.83
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO15A (HGNC:7594): (myosin XVA) This gene encodes an unconventional myosin. This protein differs from other myosins in that it has a long N-terminal extension preceding the conserved motor domain. Studies in mice suggest that this protein is necessary for actin organization in the hair cells of the cochlea. Mutations in this gene have been associated with profound, congenital, neurosensory, nonsyndromal deafness. This gene is located within the Smith-Magenis syndrome region on chromosome 17. Read-through transcripts containing an upstream gene and this gene have been identified, but they are not thought to encode a fusion protein. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described, but their full length sequences have not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.66).
BP6
Variant 17-18161416-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-18161416-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 45774.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-18161416-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.83 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.207 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MYO15ANM_016239.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.9486C>T p.Asp3162= synonymous_variant 57/66 ENST00000647165.2
MYO15AXM_017024715.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.9489C>T p.Asp3163= synonymous_variant 55/64
MYO15AXM_017024714.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.9426C>T p.Asp3142= synonymous_variant 54/63

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MYO15AENST00000647165.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.9486C>T p.Asp3162= synonymous_variant 57/66 NM_016239.4 P1Q9UKN7-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.189
AC:
28706
AN:
152020
Hom.:
2844
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.210
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.147
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.163
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.242
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0108
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.170
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.146
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.266
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.200
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.209
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.170
AC:
42355
AN:
249316
Hom.:
4068
AF XY:
0.176
AC XY:
23755
AN XY:
135302
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.212
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.103
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.237
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00679
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.180
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.144
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.205
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.193
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.184
AC:
269367
AN:
1461702
Hom.:
26167
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.186
AC XY:
134930
AN XY:
727168
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.220
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.113
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.243
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00461
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.186
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.143
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.192
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.189
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.189
AC:
28767
AN:
152138
Hom.:
2857
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.184
AC XY:
13670
AN XY:
74378
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.211
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.163
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.242
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0108
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.172
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.146
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.200
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.212
Alfa
AF:
0.194
Hom.:
2108
Bravo
AF:
0.193
Asia WGS
AF:
0.108
AC:
375
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.209
EpiControl
AF:
0.218

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMay 07, 2012Asp3162Asp in Exon 57 of MYO15A: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located wit hin the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 20.8% (1435/6896) of European American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequ encing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs8077577). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 09, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Oct 16, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 05, 2021- -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.66
Cadd
Benign
0.62
Dann
Benign
0.80

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.22
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_DG_spliceai
0.22
Position offset: 0

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs8077577; hg19: chr17-18064730; COSMIC: COSV52758423; COSMIC: COSV52758423; API