rs81002852

Variant names:

• chr13-32355294-G-A
• rs81002852
• NM_000059.4:c.7435+6G>A

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

• chr13-32355294-G-A
• chr13-32355294-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_Strong BP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.7435+6G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000144 in 1,613,504 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.00054 (0 hom., cov: 31)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00010 (1 hom.)
• Consequence: BRCA2 NM_000059.4 splice_region, intron
• Scores: Splicing: ADA: 0.0005992
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4 B:22
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.0370

Genes affected

BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.68).
• BP6: Variant 13-32355294-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32355294-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 38096.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=6, Likely_benign=9}. Variant chr13-32355294-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	NM_000059.4	c.7435+6G>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 14 of 26	ENST00000380152.8	NP_000050.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BRCA2	ENST00000380152.8	c.7435+6G>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 14 of 26	5	NM_000059.4	ENSP00000369497.3
BRCA2	ENST00000530893.7	c.7066+6G>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 14 of 26	1		ENSP00000499438.2
BRCA2	ENST00000614259.2	n.7435+6G>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 13 of 25	2		ENSP00000506251.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000526 AC: 80 AN: 152186 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00169

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000327

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00316

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000294

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.000955

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000216 AC: 54 AN: 250250 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000162 AC XY: 22 AN XY: 135436

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00224

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000261

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0000654

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000354

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000492

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000103 AC: 150 AN: 1461200 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000100 AC XY: 73 AN XY: 726920

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00203

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000291

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000465

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000279

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000431

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000538 AC: 82 AN: 152304 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000551 AC XY: 41 AN XY: 74466

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00176

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000327

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.000945

Alfa AF: 0.000442 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.000714

Asia WGS AF: 0.000867 AC: 3 AN: 3476

EpiCase AF: 0.000109

EpiControl AF: 0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:4 Benign:22

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:1 Benign:5

Dec 23, 2014

Research Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: research

- -

Apr 15, 2022

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The BRCA2 c.7435+6G>A variant was identified in 2 of 124 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.016) from individuals or families with hereditary breast or ovarian cancer (Thomassen 2012, Whiley 2011); however, control chromosomes were not evaluated in these studies, thus the prevalence of this variant in the general population could not be determined. The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs81002852) “With other allele” in the 1000 Genomes Project in 3 of 3000 chromosomes (frequency: 0.001), Exome Variant Server project in 12 of 4404 African American alleles, 0.0027), although this low number of observations and low frequency is not substantive enough to determine the prevalence of the variant in the general population and its relationship to disease. The variant was also found in the ClinVar database with conflicting data from submitters, the BIC database (14 X with unknown clinical importance), and UMD (13 X as an unknown variant). In UMD the variant was identified with one co-occurring pathogenic BRCA1 variant c.2477_2478delCA (p.Thr826ArgfsX4) and one co-occuring BRCA2 pathogenic variant c.48dup (p.Thr17AspfsX14), increasing the likelihood that the c.7435+6G>A variant does not have clinical significance. The c.7435+6G>A variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) does not predict a difference in splicing in 5 of 5 different programs. In addition, in vitro analysis of mRNA in two studies indicated no splicing alterations (Thomassen 2012, Whiley 2011). In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Oct 30, 2013

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Aug 24, 2016

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1 Benign:4

May 23, 2018

Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 16, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Jan 05, 2016

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 28, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Feb 05, 2016

Vantari Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1 Benign:4

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 27, 2023

Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2019

Hereditary Cancer Genetics group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: research

- -

Nov 01, 2021

Genetics Program, Instituto Nacional de Cancer

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

- -

Nov 16, 2021

National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1 Benign:3

Feb 03, 2009

Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 29, 2002

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 10, 2014

Counsyl

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: literature only

- -

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:4

Apr 01, 2021

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1

Sep 02, 2022

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

BRCA2-related disorder Benign:1

Apr 22, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.68
CADD	Benign	14
DANN	Benign	0.68

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA	Benign	0.00060
dbscSNV1_RF	Benign	0.18
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs81002852; hg19: chr13-32929431;