rs863225235
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 14 ACMG points: 14P and 0B. PM1PM2PP3_ModeratePP5_Very_Strong
The NM_153704.6(TMEM67):c.1115C>A(p.Thr372Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000434 in 1,612,300 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_153704.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- ciliopathyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- COACH syndrome 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
- Meckel syndrome, type 3Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- nephronophthisis 11Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- COACH syndrome 1Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
- Joubert syndrome 6Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Joubert syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Meckel syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Senior-Boichis syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 152050Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251330 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000411 AC: 6AN: 1460250Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 726498 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 152050Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74252 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Pathogenic:2
Observed multiple times in the homozygous state or with a second TMEM67 variant in individuals with Joubert syndrome and related disorders in the literature (PMID: 19058225, 19574260, 20232449, 25920555, 28838911, 36580738); Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26092869, 19058225, 20232449, 19466712, 28838911, 32000717, 19574260, 12368986, 36090483, 36580738, 25920555) -
- -
Meckel syndrome, type 3;C1853153:Joubert syndrome 6;C1865794:RHYNS syndrome;C2673874:Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14;C3150796:Nephronophthisis 11;C5435651:COACH syndrome 1 Pathogenic:1
- -
Joubert syndrome 6 Pathogenic:1
- -
Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Joubert syndrome Pathogenic:1
This sequence change replaces threonine, which is neutral and polar, with lysine, which is basic and polar, at codon 372 of the TMEM67 protein (p.Thr372Lys). The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with Joubert syndrome (PMID: 12368986, 19058225, 19574260, 20232449, 25920555, 26092869). It has also been observed to segregate with disease in related individuals. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 217726). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt TMEM67 protein function with a positive predictive value of 95%. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at