rs876657467

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4BP6BP7

The NM_133261.3(GIPC3):​c.213C>A​(p.Ile71Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000887 in 1,544,842 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000033 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000095 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

GIPC3
NM_133261.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.82

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
GIPC3 (HGNC:18183): (GIPC PDZ domain containing family member 3) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the GIPC family. Studies in mice suggest that this gene is required for postnatal maturation of the hair bundle and long-term survival of hair cells and spiral ganglion in the ear. Mutations in this gene are associated with autosomal recessive deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]
GIPC3 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 15
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.13).
BP6
Variant 19-3585810-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-3585810-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 227379.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submission is: [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.82 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
GIPC3NM_133261.3 linkc.213C>A p.Ile71Ile synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 6 ENST00000644452.3 NP_573568.1 Q8TF64
GIPC3NM_001411144.1 linkc.213C>A p.Ile71Ile synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 6 NP_001398073.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GIPC3ENST00000644452.3 linkc.213C>A p.Ile71Ile synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 6 NM_133261.3 ENSP00000493901.2 Q8TF64
GIPC3ENST00000644946.1 linkc.213C>A p.Ile71Ile synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 6 ENSP00000495068.1 A0A2R8Y651

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000330
AC:
5
AN:
151628
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000242
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000589
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0000500
AC:
7
AN:
140132
AF XY:
0.0000657
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000411
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000116
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000947
AC:
132
AN:
1393214
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000989
AC XY:
68
AN XY:
687388
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
31448
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000280
AC:
1
AN:
35664
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25118
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
35514
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
79160
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44644
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5618
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000120
AC:
129
AN:
1078150
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0000345
AC:
2
AN:
57898
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
8
16
25
33
41
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000330
AC:
5
AN:
151628
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000540
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74050
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000242
AC:
1
AN:
41242
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15216
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5140
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4798
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10566
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000589
AC:
4
AN:
67890
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2080
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.455
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
1
2
2
3
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Alfa
AF:
0.000101
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000567

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Apr 29, 2022
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this variant does not alter splicing; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Nov 26, 2022
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
Dec 17, 2015
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Ile71Ile in exon 1 of GIPC3: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wit hin the splice consensus sequence. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.13
CADD
Benign
12
DANN
Benign
0.96
PhyloP100
1.8
PromoterAI
-0.080
Neutral

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs876657467; hg19: chr19-3585808; API