rs878855086
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBS2_Supporting
The NM_024426.6(WT1):c.70C>T(p.Arg24Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000117 in 1,533,586 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 9/15 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024426.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WT1 | NM_024426.6 | c.70C>T | p.Arg24Cys | missense_variant | 1/10 | ENST00000452863.10 | NP_077744.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WT1 | ENST00000452863.10 | c.70C>T | p.Arg24Cys | missense_variant | 1/10 | 1 | NM_024426.6 | ENSP00000415516.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 151996Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000941 AC: 13AN: 1381590Hom.: 0 Cov.: 44 AF XY: 0.00000880 AC XY: 6AN XY: 681644
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 151996Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74242
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
11p partial monosomy syndrome;C0950121:Drash syndrome;C0950122:Frasier syndrome;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Sep 26, 2023 | In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 19 of the WT1 protein (p.Arg19Cys). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with WT1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 241484). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Not Available"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Not Available". The cysteine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. - |
Drash syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Oct 26, 2023 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 07, 2022 | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge - |
Wilms tumor 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | May 27, 2021 | The WT1 c.55C>T (p.Arg19Cys) missense change is absent in gnomAD v2.1.1 (PM2_Supporting; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). Four of six in silico tools predict a benign effect of this variant on protein function (BP4), but to our knowledge these predictions have not been confirmed by functional assays. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with WT1-related conditions. In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as of uncertain significance based on the ACMG/AMP criteria: PM2_Supporting, BP4. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at