rs879253995
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 6P and 4B. PM1PP2PP3_ModeratePP5BS2
The NM_000166.6(GJB1):c.376C>T(p.His126Tyr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000548 in 1,094,628 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 2 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. H126H) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000166.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease X-linked dominant 1Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet
- X-linked progressive cerebellar ataxiaInheritance: XL Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000166.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GJB1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.376C>T | p.His126Tyr | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000354900.6 | P08034 | ||
| GJB1 | TSL:5 | c.376C>T | p.His126Tyr | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000363141.1 | P08034 | ||
| GJB1 | TSL:5 | c.376C>T | p.His126Tyr | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000407223.2 | P08034 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 22
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000548 AC: 6AN: 1094628Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000555 AC XY: 2AN XY: 360340 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 22
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at