rs879255644
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PM4_SupportingPP3PP5_Moderate
The NM_001206979.2(NR1H4):c.419_420insAAA(p.Tyr139_Asn140insLys) variant causes a disruptive inframe insertion change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,894 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001206979.2 disruptive_inframe_insertion
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251464Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000736 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135908
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461894Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727248
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Cholestasis, progressive familial intrahepatic, 5 Pathogenic:1
- -
Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 1 Pathogenic:1
This variant was found in compound heterozygous status with another exonic deletion in two affected members of a Caucasian family -
NR1H4-related disorder Uncertain:1
The NR1H4 c.419_420insAAA variant is predicted to result in an in-frame amino acid insertion (p.Tyr139_Asn140insLys). This variant was reported in the compound heterozygous state with another exonic deletion in two related individuals with familial intrahepatic cholestasis (Gomez-Ospina et al 2016. PubMed ID: 26888176). This variant is reported in 0.00088% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD. This variant has interpretations of pathogenic in ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/219162/). Although we suspect that this variant may be pathogenic, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at