rs948962

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):​c.5860C>A​(p.Leu1954Ile) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.472 in 1,602,936 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 184,200 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L1954L) has been classified as Benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.53 ( 22476 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.47 ( 161724 hom. )

Consequence

MYO7A
NM_000260.4 missense

Scores

1
17

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.96
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO7A (HGNC:7606): (myosin VIIA) This gene is a member of the myosin gene family. Myosins are mechanochemical proteins characterized by the presence of a motor domain, an actin-binding domain, a neck domain that interacts with other proteins, and a tail domain that serves as an anchor. This gene encodes an unconventional myosin with a very short tail. Defects in this gene are associated with the mouse shaker-1 phenotype and the human Usher syndrome 1B which are characterized by deafness, reduced vestibular function, and (in human) retinal degeneration. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=8.922537E-6).
BP6
Variant 11-77208433-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-77208433-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 43304.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-77208433-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.69 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MYO7ANM_000260.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.5860C>A p.Leu1954Ile missense_variant 43/49 ENST00000409709.9 NP_000251.3 Q13402-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYO7AENST00000409709.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.5860C>A p.Leu1954Ile missense_variant 43/491 NM_000260.4 ENSP00000386331.3 Q13402-1
MYO7AENST00000458637.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.5746C>A p.Leu1916Ile missense_variant 43/491 ENSP00000392185.2 Q13402-2
MYO7AENST00000409619.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.5713C>A p.Leu1905Ile missense_variant 44/501 ENSP00000386635.2 Q13402-8
MYO7AENST00000458169.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.3286C>A p.Leu1096Ile missense_variant 23/291 ENSP00000417017.2 H7C4D8
MYO7AENST00000670577.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.*458C>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 26/32 ENSP00000499323.1 A0A590UJ94
MYO7AENST00000670577.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.*458C>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 26/32 ENSP00000499323.1 A0A590UJ94

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.532
AC:
80721
AN:
151740
Hom.:
22422
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.696
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.298
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.512
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.451
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.336
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.311
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.569
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.535
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.468
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.542
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.474
AC:
116423
AN:
245742
Hom.:
28452
AF XY:
0.461
AC XY:
61477
AN XY:
133302
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.697
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.551
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.447
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.355
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.315
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.560
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.468
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.470
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.466
AC:
676045
AN:
1451080
Hom.:
161724
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.461
AC XY:
332593
AN XY:
721950
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.704
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.551
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.444
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.324
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.317
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.561
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.467
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.468
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.532
AC:
80841
AN:
151856
Hom.:
22476
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.532
AC XY:
39442
AN XY:
74208
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.696
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.513
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.451
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.336
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.311
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.569
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.468
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.540
Alfa
AF:
0.475
Hom.:
41056
Bravo
AF:
0.539
TwinsUK
AF:
0.478
AC:
1774
ALSPAC
AF:
0.461
AC:
1777
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.689
AC:
2851
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.481
AC:
4046
ExAC
AF:
0.468
AC:
56555
Asia WGS
AF:
0.362
AC:
1260
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineOct 28, 2006- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Nov 19, 2014- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 01, 2021- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 01, 2021- -
Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 01, 2021- -
Usher syndrome type 1B Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.037
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.60
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.49
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Benign
0.82
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.21
T;.;.;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.61
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.48
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.16
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.45
T;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0000089
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.94
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-1.9
N;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.82
D
PROVEAN
Benign
1.9
N;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.24
Sift
Benign
1.0
T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T;T;T;T
Vest4
0.15
MPC
0.091
ClinPred
0.0016
T
GERP RS
4.3
Varity_R
0.097
gMVP
0.13

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs948962; hg19: chr11-76919478; COSMIC: COSV68684428; COSMIC: COSV68684428; API