rs9581943
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBA1
The NM_000209.4(PDX1):c.-279G>A variant causes a upstream gene change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.317 in 152,138 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8,883 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000209.4 upstream_gene
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 4Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- pancreatic agenesis 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- permanent neonatal diabetes mellitusInheritance: AR, AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet
- monogenic diabetesInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
- maturity-onset diabetes of the youngInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- pancreatic agenesisInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.317 AC: 48137AN: 152020Hom.: 8881 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.317 AC: 48155AN: 152138Hom.: 8883 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.320 AC XY: 23775AN XY: 74368 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at