1-68431318-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000329.3(RPE65):āc.1302G>Cā(p.Ala434Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00154 in 1,613,908 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 34 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A434A) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000329.3 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPE65 | NM_000329.3 | c.1302G>C | p.Ala434Ala | synonymous_variant | 12/14 | ENST00000262340.6 | NP_000320.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPE65 | ENST00000262340.6 | c.1302G>C | p.Ala434Ala | synonymous_variant | 12/14 | 1 | NM_000329.3 | ENSP00000262340.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00829 AC: 1261AN: 152128Hom.: 17 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00219 AC: 550AN: 250846Hom.: 7 AF XY: 0.00156 AC XY: 211AN XY: 135524
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000838 AC: 1225AN: 1461662Hom.: 17 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000714 AC XY: 519AN XY: 727126
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00829 AC: 1262AN: 152246Hom.: 17 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00881 AC XY: 656AN XY: 74424
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2Other:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | Retina International | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 21, 2019 | - - |
Leber congenital amaurosis 2;C3151086:Retinitis pigmentosa 20 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Mar 06, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Leber congenital amaurosis 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at