14-23394174-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 1P and 13B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_002471.4(MYH6):c.2579G>A(p.Arg860His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00101 in 1,614,210 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 17 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002471.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYH6 | NM_002471.4 | c.2579G>A | p.Arg860His | missense_variant | 21/39 | ENST00000405093.9 | NP_002462.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYH6 | ENST00000405093.9 | c.2579G>A | p.Arg860His | missense_variant | 21/39 | 5 | NM_002471.4 | ENSP00000386041.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00526 AC: 800AN: 152202Hom.: 10 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00141 AC: 355AN: 251478Hom.: 4 AF XY: 0.00108 AC XY: 147AN XY: 135918
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000569 AC: 832AN: 1461890Hom.: 6 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000564 AC XY: 410AN XY: 727248
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00525 AC: 800AN: 152320Hom.: 11 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00517 AC XY: 385AN XY: 74470
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jun 24, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | May 10, 2012 | Arg860His in Exon 21 of MYH6: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it has been identified in 1.7% (64/3738) of African American ch romosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http:// evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs115845031). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 18, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 06, 2018 | Variant summary: MYH6 c.2579G>A (p.Arg860His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Myosin tail of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0017 in 277230 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.017 within the African subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within African control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 679.99 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in MYH6 causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (2.5e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African origin. Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 16, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute | - | - - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego | Jun 03, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Feb 26, 2016 | - - |
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | research | Zaffran Lab, Genetics of Cardiac Diseases Laboratory, Marseille Medical Genetics | - | - - |
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 14 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 29, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at