19-38440802-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points: 10P and 0B. PP1_StrongPP3_ModeratePM1PS4_Moderate
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: This pathogenicity assessment is relevant only for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. Variants in RYR1 can also cause other myopathies inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern or in an autosomal recessive pattern. Some of these disorders may predispose individuals to malignant hyperthermia. RYR1 variants may also contribute to a malignant hyperthermia reaction in combination with other genetic and non-genetic factors and the clinician needs to consider such factors in making management decisions. This sequence variant predicts a substitution of cysteine with arginine at codon 35 of the RYR1 protein, p.(Cys35Arg). The maximum allele frequency for this variant among the six major gnomAD populations is NFE: 0.000009, a frequency consistent with pathogenicity for MHS. This variant has been reported in three unrelated individuals who have a personal or family history of a malignant hyperthermia reaction and positive in vitro contracture test (IVCT) or caffeine halothane contracture test (CHCT) result (when the proband was unavailable for testing a positive diagnostic test result in a mutation positive relative was counted), PS4_Moderate (PMID:17710899, PMID:20681998, PMID:9066328). Functional studies in HEK293 cells show conflicting data regarding sensitivity to RYR1 agonists, PS3/BS3 were not implemented (PMID:9334205, PMID:26115329). This variant resides in a region of RYR1 considered to be a hotspot for pathogenic variants that contribute to MHS, PM1 (PMID:21118704). This variant segregates with MHS in 11 individuals, PP1_Strong (PMID:9066328). A REVEL score > 0.85 supports pathogenicity, PP3_Moderate. Criteria implemented: PS4_Moderate, PM1, PP3_Moderate, PP1_Strong. Based on using Bayes to combine criteria this variant is assessed as Pathogenic, (PMID:29300386). LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA023838/MONDO:0007783/012
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000540.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR1 | NM_000540.3 | c.103T>C | p.Cys35Arg | missense_variant | 2/106 | ENST00000359596.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR1 | ENST00000359596.8 | c.103T>C | p.Cys35Arg | missense_variant | 2/106 | 5 | NM_000540.3 | A2 | |
RYR1 | ENST00000355481.8 | c.103T>C | p.Cys35Arg | missense_variant | 2/105 | 1 | P4 | ||
RYR1 | ENST00000599547.6 | c.103T>C | p.Cys35Arg | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 2/80 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000421 AC: 1AN: 237252Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000771 AC XY: 1AN XY: 129618
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1456988Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 724558
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74352
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 1 Pathogenic:2
Pathogenic, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen Malignant Hyperthermia Susceptibility Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen | Mar 18, 2021 | This pathogenicity assessment is relevant only for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. Variants in RYR1 can also cause other myopathies inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern or in an autosomal recessive pattern. Some of these disorders may predispose individuals to malignant hyperthermia. RYR1 variants may also contribute to a malignant hyperthermia reaction in combination with other genetic and non-genetic factors and the clinician needs to consider such factors in making management decisions. This sequence variant predicts a substitution of cysteine with arginine at codon 35 of the RYR1 protein, p.(Cys35Arg). The maximum allele frequency for this variant among the six major gnomAD populations is NFE: 0.000009, a frequency consistent with pathogenicity for MHS. This variant has been reported in three unrelated individuals who have a personal or family history of a malignant hyperthermia reaction and positive in vitro contracture test (IVCT) or caffeine halothane contracture test (CHCT) result (when the proband was unavailable for testing a positive diagnostic test result in a mutation positive relative was counted), PS4_Moderate (PMID:17710899, PMID:20681998, PMID:9066328). Functional studies in HEK293 cells show conflicting data regarding sensitivity to RYR1 agonists, PS3/BS3 were not implemented (PMID:9334205, PMID:26115329). This variant resides in a region of RYR1 considered to be a hotspot for pathogenic variants that contribute to MHS, PM1 (PMID: 21118704). This variant segregates with MHS in 11 individuals, PP1_Strong (PMID:9066328). A REVEL score > 0.85 supports pathogenicity, PP3_Moderate. Criteria implemented: PS4_Moderate, PM1, PP3_Moderate, PP1_Strong. Based on using Bayes to combine criteria this variant is assessed as Pathogenic, (PMID: 29300386). - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Jan 08, 2024 | This missense variant replaces cysteine with arginine at codon 35 of the RYR1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function. This variant occurs in a region of the RYR1 protein that is considered to be a hotspot for pathogenic variants that contribute to malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (PMID: 21118704). Functional studies in HEK293 cells are conflicted in the impact of this variant on sensitivity to caffeine and halothane compared to cells expressing wild-type RYR1 (PMID: 9334205, 26115329, 31841587). This variant has been reported in at least four unrelated families or individuals affected with malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (PMID: 9066328, 16163667, 17710899, 20681998). It has been shown that this variant segregates with the malignant hyperthermia susceptibility phenotype in one family (PMID: 9066328). This variant has been identified in 1/237252 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). Based on the available evidence, this variant is classified as Pathogenic. - |
RYR1-related disorder Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | May 27, 2023 | For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt RYR1 protein function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 132995). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with autosomal dominant malignant hyperthermia (PMID: 9066328). It has also been observed to segregate with disease in related individuals. The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This sequence change replaces cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, with arginine, which is basic and polar, at codon 35 of the RYR1 protein (p.Cys35Arg). - |
methoxyflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
sevoflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
isoflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
enflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
halothane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
desflurane response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
not provided Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | Leiden Muscular Dystrophy (RYR1) | - | - - |
succinylcholine response - Toxicity Other:1
drug response, reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB | Mar 24, 2021 | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. Drug-variant association: Toxicity |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at