Menu
GeneBe

22-26599505-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7

The NM_001887.4(CRYBB1):c.744A>G(p.Thr248=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00059 in 1,612,666 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00035 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00061 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CRYBB1
NM_001887.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -6.08
Variant links:
Genes affected
CRYBB1 (HGNC:2397): (crystallin beta B1) Crystallins are separated into two classes: taxon-specific, or enzyme, and ubiquitous. The latter class constitutes the major proteins of vertebrate eye lens and maintains the transparency and refractive index of the lens. Since lens central fiber cells lose their nuclei during development, these crystallins are made and then retained throughout life, making them extremely stable proteins. Mammalian lens crystallins are divided into alpha, beta, and gamma families; beta and gamma crystallins are also considered as a superfamily. Alpha and beta families are further divided into acidic and basic groups. Seven protein regions exist in crystallins: four homologous motifs, a connecting peptide, and N- and C-terminal extensions. Beta-crystallins, the most heterogeneous, differ by the presence of the C-terminal extension (present in the basic group, none in the acidic group). Beta-crystallins form aggregates of different sizes and are able to self-associate to form dimers or to form heterodimers with other beta-crystallins. This gene, a beta basic group member, undergoes extensive cleavage at its N-terminal extension during lens maturation. It is also a member of a gene cluster with beta-A4, beta-B2, and beta-B3. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.97).
BP6
Variant 22-26599505-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-26599505-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 341042.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-6.08 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CRYBB1NM_001887.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.744A>G p.Thr248= synonymous_variant 6/6 ENST00000647684.1
CRYBB1XM_011529899.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.744A>G p.Thr248= synonymous_variant 6/6
CRYBA4XM_006724140.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.-239+2422T>C intron_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CRYBB1ENST00000647684.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.744A>G p.Thr248= synonymous_variant 6/6 NM_001887.4 P1
ENST00000668614.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.56+2422T>C intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000348
AC:
53
AN:
152234
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000121
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000632
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000958
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000395
AC:
99
AN:
250910
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000413
AC XY:
56
AN XY:
135684
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000124
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000767
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000615
AC:
898
AN:
1460432
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000560
AC XY:
407
AN XY:
726510
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000313
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000766
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000481
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000348
AC:
53
AN:
152234
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000323
AC XY:
24
AN XY:
74374
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000121
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000632
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000958
Alfa
AF:
0.000491
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000378
EpiCase
AF:
0.000436
EpiControl
AF:
0.000652

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cataract 17 multiple types Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeMay 12, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
CRYBB1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJun 10, 2019This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.97
Cadd
Benign
0.095
Dann
Benign
0.61

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs142495368; hg19: chr22-26995469; API