22-26599676-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_001887.4(CRYBB1):c.576-3C>A variant causes a splice region, splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000109 in 1,613,654 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00012 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

CRYBB1
NM_001887.4 splice_region, splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.9252

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.47

Variant links:

Genes affected

CRYBB1 (HGNC:2397): (crystallin beta B1) Crystallins are separated into two classes: taxon-specific, or enzyme, and ubiquitous. The latter class constitutes the major proteins of vertebrate eye lens and maintains the transparency and refractive index of the lens. Since lens central fiber cells lose their nuclei during development, these crystallins are made and then retained throughout life, making them extremely stable proteins. Mammalian lens crystallins are divided into alpha, beta, and gamma families; beta and gamma crystallins are also considered as a superfamily. Alpha and beta families are further divided into acidic and basic groups. Seven protein regions exist in crystallins: four homologous motifs, a connecting peptide, and N- and C-terminal extensions. Beta-crystallins, the most heterogeneous, differ by the presence of the C-terminal extension (present in the basic group, none in the acidic group). Beta-crystallins form aggregates of different sizes and are able to self-associate to form dimers or to form heterodimers with other beta-crystallins. This gene, a beta basic group member, undergoes extensive cleavage at its N-terminal extension during lens maturation. It is also a member of a gene cluster with beta-A4, beta-B2, and beta-B3. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

CRYBB1 links:

(HGNC:):

links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.76).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000116 (170/1461284) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00423 (168/39696). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00371. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 74 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	MANE
CRYBB1	NM_001887.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.576-3C>A	splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant	ENST00000647684.1
CRYBA4	XM_006724140.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.-239+2593G>T	intron_variant
CRYBB1	XM_011529899.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.576-3C>A	splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
CRYBB1	ENST00000647684.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.576-3C>A		splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant			NM_001887.4	P1
	ENST00000668614.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.56+2593G>T		intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

AN:

152252

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00115

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000562

AC:

AN:

248904

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000297

AC XY:

AN XY:

134830

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000707

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000116

AC:

170

AN:

1461284

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000102

AC XY:

AN XY:

726992

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00423

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000331

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

AN:

152370

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000268

AC XY:

AN XY:

74518

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00116

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000868

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000189

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cataract 17 multiple types

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.76

Cadd

Benign

Dann

Benign

0.64

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.93

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.64

SpliceAI score (max)

0.050

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over