NM_001374258.1:c.1526G>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 14 ACMG points: 14P and 0B. PS4PM1PS3_SupportingPS2PP3PP2PM2_Supporting
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.1406G>A variant in BRAF is a missense variant predicted to cause substitution of glycine by glutamic acid at amino acid 469 (p.Gly469Glu). This variant is absent from gnomAD v4 (PM2_Supporting). The variant is located in the BRAF gene, which has been defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel as a gene with a low rate of benign missense variants and pathogenic missense variants are common (PP2). The REVEL computational prediction analysis tool produced a score of 0.921, which is above the threshold necessary to apply PP3 (PP3). Furthermore, this variant is in a location which has been defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel functional domain of BRAF (PM1). This variant has been reported in the literature in at least 12 patients with clinical features of RASopathy (PS4, PMIDs: 18042262, 16474404, 30141192, 29907801, 35418823), out of which 3 patients were reported as a confirmed de novo occurrence (PS2_VeryStrong; PMIDs: 18042262, 16474404). Luciferase assays showed that p.Gly469Glu did not enhance ELK-dependent transcription indicating that this variant impacts protein function (PS3_Supporting; 16474404). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as pathogenic for autosomal dominant RASopathies based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel: PS2_VeryStrong, PS4, PM1, PS3_Supporting, PM2_Supporting, PP2, PP3 (Specification Version 2.1, 9/17/2024) LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA279970/MONDO:0015280/049
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001374258.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRAF | ENST00000644969.2 | c.1526G>A | p.Gly509Glu | missense_variant | Exon 12 of 20 | NM_001374258.1 | ENSP00000496776.1 | |||
BRAF | ENST00000646891.2 | c.1406G>A | p.Gly469Glu | missense_variant | Exon 11 of 18 | NM_004333.6 | ENSP00000493543.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0;AS_VQSR AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 1461736Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727174
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome 1 Pathogenic:5
- -
- -
- -
- -
The observed variant c.1406G>A (p.G469E) is not reported in 1000 Genomes and has a minor allele frequency of 0.000008238 in ExAC databases. The in silico prediction of the variant is disease causing by MutationTaster2, damaging by SIFT, and probably damaging by PolyPhen2. -
not provided Pathogenic:3
PP2, PP3, PM1, PM2, PS2_VeryStrong, PS3 -
Published functional studies demonstrate a damaging effect on B-Raf activity and MEK and ERK phosphorylation (Rodriguez-Viciana et al., 2006); Missense variants in this gene are often considered pathogenic (HGMD); Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23093928, 34573299, 30141192, 34184824, 29907801, 18042262, 16474404, 16439621, 19206169, 24803665, 33040082) -
- -
RASopathy Pathogenic:3
Variant classified using ACMG guidelines -
This sequence change replaces glycine, which is neutral and non-polar, with glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 469 of the BRAF protein (p.Gly469Glu). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome (PMID: 16439621, 16474404, 18042262, 19206169). In at least one individual the variant was observed to be de novo. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 13974). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt BRAF protein function with a positive predictive value of 80%. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. -
The c.1406G>A variant in BRAF is a missense variant predicted to cause substitution of glycine by glutamic acid at amino acid 469 (p.Gly469Glu). This variant is absent from gnomAD v4 (PM2_Supporting). The variant is located in the BRAF gene, which has been defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel as a gene with a low rate of benign missense variants and pathogenic missense variants are common (PP2). The REVEL computational prediction analysis tool produced a score of 0.921, which is above the threshold necessary to apply PP3 (PP3). Furthermore, this variant is in a location which has been defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel functional domain of BRAF (PM1). This variant has been reported in the literature in at least 12 patients with clinical features of RASopathy (PS4, PMIDs: 18042262, 16474404, 30141192, 29907801, 35418823), out of which 3 patients were reported as a confirmed de novo occurrence (PS2_VeryStrong; PMIDs: 18042262, 16474404). Luciferase assays showed that p.Gly469Glu did not enhance ELK-dependent transcription indicating that this variant impacts protein function (PS3_Supporting; 16474404). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as pathogenic for autosomal dominant RASopathies based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel: PS2_VeryStrong, PS4, PM1, PS3_Supporting, PM2_Supporting, PP2, PP3 (Specification Version 2.1, 9/17/2024) -
Cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome Pathogenic:2Other:1
The Gly469Glu variant has been reported in the literature in several individuals with clinical features of Cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome (Niihori 2006, Schulz 2008). In addition, this variant was reported to have occurred de novo in three of those individuals. Therefore, this variant is highly likely to be pathogenic . -
Variant interpreted as Pathogenic and reported on 12-02-2009 by Lab or GTR ID 21766. GenomeConnect-CFC International assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. -
Variant summary: BRAF c.1406G>A (p.Gly469Glu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the protein kinase domain (IPR000719) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 251520 control chromosomes. c.1406G>A has been reported in the literature as a de-novo variant in multiple individuals affected with Cardiofaciocutaneous Syndrome (example, Nihori_2006, Smalley_2009, Sarkozy_2009, Pandit_2007, Schultz_2008, Greaves_2013, Ciara_2015, Lee_2011). These data indicate that the variant is very likely to be associated with disease. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function. The most pronounced variant effect results in an induction of ERK activation by trigerring C-RAF activity as a distinct mechanism of action (Wan_2004). Five clinical diagnostic laboratories and one expert panel (ClinGen RASopathy panel) have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as pathogenic. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as pathogenic. -
Noonan syndrome 7 Pathogenic:1
- -
not specified Pathogenic:1
- -
Noonan syndrome 1 Pathogenic:1
- -
Noonan syndrome and Noonan-related syndrome Pathogenic:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at