X-71223251-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_000166.6(GJB1):c.-101C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000692 in 202,207 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 7 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 ( 0 hom., 4 hem., cov: 22)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000066 ( 0 hom. 3 hem. )
Consequence
GJB1
NM_000166.6 5_prime_UTR
NM_000166.6 5_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.08
Genes affected
GJB1 (HGNC:4283): (gap junction protein beta 1) This gene encodes a member of the gap junction protein family. The gap junction proteins are membrane-spanning proteins that assemble to form gap junction channels that facilitate the transfer of ions and small molecules between cells. According to sequence similarities at the nucleotide and amino acid levels, the gap junction proteins are divided into two categories, alpha and beta. Mutations in this gene cause X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, an inherited peripheral neuropathy. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding the same protein have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.47).
BP6
Variant X-71223251-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-71223251-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 380606.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BS2
High Hemizygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 XL gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GJB1 | NM_000166.6 | c.-101C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/2 | ENST00000361726.7 | ||
GJB1 | NM_001097642.3 | c.-16-441C>T | intron_variant | ||||
GJB1 | XM_011530907.3 | c.-16-441C>T | intron_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GJB1 | ENST00000361726.7 | c.-101C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/2 | 1 | NM_000166.6 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000718 AC: 8AN: 111410Hom.: 0 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.000119 AC XY: 4AN XY: 33594
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
111410
Hom.:
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
33594
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000661 AC: 6AN: 90797Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.000131 AC XY: 3AN XY: 22947
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
90797
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
22947
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000718 AC: 8AN: 111410Hom.: 0 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.000119 AC XY: 4AN XY: 33594
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
111410
Hom.:
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
33594
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Feb 28, 2023 | Available data are insufficient to determine the clinical significance of the variant at this time. The frequency of this variant in the general population is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). Computational tools yielded predictions that this variant is unlikely to have an effect on normal RNA splicing. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 30, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
GJB1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jun 13, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at