chr1-68429584-T-C

Position:

• chr1-68429584-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_Strong BS1_Supporting BS2

The NM_000329.3(RPE65):​c.*192A>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000936 in 628,058 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0028 (4 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00035 (1 hom.)
• Consequence: RPE65 NM_000329.3 3_prime_UTR
• Clinical Significance: Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:2
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.730

Genes affected

RPE65 (HGNC:10294): (retinoid isomerohydrolase RPE65) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of the vitamin A visual cycle of the retina which supplies the 11-cis retinal chromophore of the photoreceptors opsin visual pigments. It is a member of the carotenoid cleavage oxygenase superfamily. All members of this superfamily are non-heme iron oxygenases with a seven-bladed propeller fold and oxidatively cleave carotenoid carbon:carbon double bonds. However, the protein encoded by this gene has acquired a divergent function that involves the concerted O-alkyl ester cleavage of its all-trans retinyl ester substrate and all-trans to 11-cis double bond isomerization of the retinyl moiety. As such, it performs the essential enzymatic isomerization step in the synthesis of 11-cis retinal. Mutations in this gene are associated with early-onset severe blinding disorders such as Leber congenital. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2017]

LOC124904198 (HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00276 (420/152286) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00945 (393/41574). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00868. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 199 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RPE65	NM_000329.3	c.*192A>G		3_prime_UTR_variant	14/14	ENST00000262340.6	NP_000320.1
LOC124904198	XR_007066164.1	n.71+9463T>C		intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RPE65	ENST00000262340.6	c.*192A>G		3_prime_UTR_variant	14/14	1	NM_000329.3	ENSP00000262340	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00275 AC: 418 AN: 152168 Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00943

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00138

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00633

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00191

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000353 AC: 168 AN: 475772 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 6 AF XY: 0.000333 AC XY: 84 AN XY: 252622

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00790

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000898

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.000150

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000238

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00113

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00276 AC: 420 AN: 152286 Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00267 AC XY: 199 AN XY: 74458

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00945

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00137

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00189

Alfa AF: 0.00243 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00318

Asia WGS AF: 0.00173 AC: 6 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

Submissions by phenotype

Leber congenital amaurosis 2 Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.84
CADD	Benign	0.39
DANN	Benign	0.29

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs142768806; hg19: chr1-68895267;