chr13-48345161-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS2
The NM_000321.3(RB1):c.462G>A(p.Lys154=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000496 in 1,612,692 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000046 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000050 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
RB1
NM_000321.3 synonymous
NM_000321.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.625
Genes affected
RB1 (HGNC:9884): (RB transcriptional corepressor 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a negative regulator of the cell cycle and was the first tumor suppressor gene found. The encoded protein also stabilizes constitutive heterochromatin to maintain the overall chromatin structure. The active, hypophosphorylated form of the protein binds transcription factor E2F1. Defects in this gene are a cause of childhood cancer retinoblastoma (RB), bladder cancer, and osteogenic sarcoma. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.43).
BP6
Variant 13-48345161-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-48345161-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 458169.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=2}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.625 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 7 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RB1 | NM_000321.3 | c.462G>A | p.Lys154= | synonymous_variant | 4/27 | ENST00000267163.6 | |
RB1 | NM_001407165.1 | c.462G>A | p.Lys154= | synonymous_variant | 4/27 | ||
RB1 | NM_001407166.1 | c.462G>A | p.Lys154= | synonymous_variant | 4/17 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RB1 | ENST00000267163.6 | c.462G>A | p.Lys154= | synonymous_variant | 4/27 | 1 | NM_000321.3 | P1 | |
RB1 | ENST00000467505.5 | c.138-14856G>A | intron_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 1 | |||||
RB1 | ENST00000650461.1 | c.462G>A | p.Lys154= | synonymous_variant | 4/27 | ||||
RB1 | ENST00000525036.1 | n.624G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 4/7 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152150Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
152150
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000439 AC: 11AN: 250734Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000369 AC XY: 5AN XY: 135580
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
11
AN:
250734
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
135580
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000500 AC: 73AN: 1460542Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000482 AC XY: 35AN XY: 726670
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
73
AN:
1460542
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
35
AN XY:
726670
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152150Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74334
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
152150
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74334
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Retinoblastoma Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 25, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 25, 2018 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 17, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
RB1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Nov 17, 2021 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at