rs369830657

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS2

The NM_000321.3(RB1):c.462G>A(p.Lys154Lys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000496 in 1,612,692 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000046 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000050 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RB1
NM_000321.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.625

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

RB1 (HGNC:9884): (RB transcriptional corepressor 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a negative regulator of the cell cycle and was the first tumor suppressor gene found. The encoded protein also stabilizes constitutive heterochromatin to maintain the overall chromatin structure. The active, hypophosphorylated form of the protein binds transcription factor E2F1. Defects in this gene are a cause of childhood cancer retinoblastoma (RB), bladder cancer, and osteogenic sarcoma. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

RB1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

hereditary retinoblastoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, G2P, Ambry Genetics
retinoblastoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
melanoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

RB1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.43).

BP6

Variant 13-48345161-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-48345161-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 458169.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.625 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 7 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RB1	NM_000321.3 link	c.462G>A	p.Lys154Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 27	ENST00000267163.6	NP_000312.2	P06400A0A024RDV3
RB1	NM_001407165.1 link	c.462G>A	p.Lys154Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 27		NP_001394094.1
RB1	NM_001407166.1 link	c.462G>A	p.Lys154Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 17		NP_001394095.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RB1	ENST00000267163.6 link	c.462G>A	p.Lys154Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 27	1	NM_000321.3	ENSP00000267163.4		P06400

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000460

AC:

AN:

152150

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000288

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000439

AC:

AN:

250734

AF XY:

0.0000369

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000469

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000500

AC:

AN:

1460542

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000482

AC XY:

AN XY:

726670

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33454

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44712

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0000766

AC:

AN:

26094

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39500

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86236

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

52912

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5742

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000621

AC:

AN:

1111550

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000331

AC:

AN:

60342

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.428

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000460

AC:

AN:

152150

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000135

AC XY:

AN XY:

74334

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41444

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15276

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000288

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5204

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10606

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000882

AC:

AN:

67998

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.546

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000565

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000416

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Retinoblastoma

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Jan 11, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Feb 05, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Oct 25, 2018

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Oct 17, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

RB1-related disorder

Benign:1

Nov 17, 2021

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.43

CADD

Benign

7.1

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.65

PhyloP100

0.63

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over