chr2-176093057-GGGCGGCGGCGGC-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP3BS1_SupportingBS2
The NM_000523.4(HOXD13):c.171_182delGGCGGCGGCGGC(p.Ala58_Ala61del) variant causes a disruptive inframe deletion change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000158 in 1,369,924 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. It is difficult to determine the true allele frequency of this variant because it is of type DEL_BIG, and the frequency of such variant types in population databases may be underestimated and unreliable. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000523.4 disruptive_inframe_deletion
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- brachydactyly-syndactyly syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, G2P
- synpolydactyly type 1Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- brachydactyly type EInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- syndactyly type 5Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000523.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000206 AC: 31AN: 150788Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00158 AC: 34AN: 21526 AF XY: 0.00126 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000152 AC: 185AN: 1219028Hom.: 9 AF XY: 0.000139 AC XY: 83AN XY: 595810 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000205 AC: 31AN: 150896Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000217 AC XY: 16AN XY: 73668 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at