chr2-214767467-C-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_000465.4(BARD1):c.1568+15G>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000124 in 1,610,002 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00013 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
BARD1
NM_000465.4 intron
NM_000465.4 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.195
Genes affected
BARD1 (HGNC:952): (BRCA1 associated RING domain 1) This gene encodes a protein which interacts with the N-terminal region of BRCA1. In addition to its ability to bind BRCA1 in vivo and in vitro, it shares homology with the 2 most conserved regions of BRCA1: the N-terminal RING motif and the C-terminal BRCT domain. The RING motif is a cysteine-rich sequence found in a variety of proteins that regulate cell growth, including the products of tumor suppressor genes and dominant protooncogenes. This protein also contains 3 tandem ankyrin repeats. The BARD1/BRCA1 interaction is disrupted by tumorigenic amino acid substitutions in BRCA1, implying that the formation of a stable complex between these proteins may be an essential aspect of BRCA1 tumor suppression. This protein may be the target of oncogenic mutations in breast or ovarian cancer. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 2-214767467-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-214767467-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 140771.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=1}.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 16 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BARD1 | NM_000465.4 | c.1568+15G>T | intron_variant | ENST00000260947.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BARD1 | ENST00000260947.9 | c.1568+15G>T | intron_variant | 1 | NM_000465.4 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000105 AC: 16AN: 152154Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
16
AN:
152154
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000638 AC: 16AN: 250856Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000738 AC XY: 10AN XY: 135586
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
16
AN:
250856
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
135586
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000126 AC: 183AN: 1457848Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000112 AC XY: 81AN XY: 725522
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
183
AN:
1457848
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
81
AN XY:
725522
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000105 AC: 16AN: 152154Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000404 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74324
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
16
AN:
152154
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74324
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 27, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Sep 29, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 08, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 30, 2015 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BARD1 c.1568+15G>T variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the MutDB, Clinvitae or Zhejiang University Databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs145936354) as “With Likely benign allele” and ClinVar (2x as likely benign by Ambry Genetics and Color Genomics). This variant was identified in our laboratory in one breast cancer patient co-occurring with a pathogenic CHEK2 variant (c.684-?_846+?del), increasing the likelihood that the c.1568+15G>T variant does not have clinical significance. The variant was identified in control databases in 17 of 276586 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00006 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 3 of 24014 chromosomes (freq: 0.000125) and European Non-Finnish in 14 of 126260 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001); it was not observed in the “Other”, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European Finnish, or South Asian populations. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; however, this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at